LATIN AMERICA

Index:  Brazil ; Colombia ; Venezuela


BRAZIL

A decree was passed in June 30th 1999 implementing the new Brazilian law n° 9790 of March 1999, on Civil Society Organizations of Public Interest (OSCIP). This report summarizes key provisions of the law and decree.

 1.       Civil Society Organizations of Public Interest

1.1.    Civil Societies Organizations of Public Interest are, according to article 1 of the law, “non-profit legal entities of private law whose social purposes and charter meet the requirements established in this law”. Twelve activities, listed in article 3 of the law, entitle an organization to qualify for OSCIP status:

·      “Promotion of social assistance”. This activity has been clarified in article 6 of the decree passed in June. It refers to the promotion of the development of providing care and assistance to, and of defending and guarantying the rights of beneficiaries mentioned in the Law on Social Assistance (families, children, disabled persons…)

·      “Free promotion of education”. Article 6 of the June decree requires the organization to render such services through its own financial resources and not from fees or donations in exchange for the service.

·      “Free promotion of health”.

·      “Promotion of nutritional and food security”.

·      “Defense, preservation and maintenance of the environment and promotion of sustainable development”.

·      “Promotion of voluntary work”.

·      “Promotion of economic and social development and efforts to combat poverty”.

·      “Non-profit experimentation of new socio-productive models, and production, commercial, employment and credit alternative systems”.

·      “Promotion of established rights, creation of new rights and free juridical assessment of other interest”.

·      “Promotion of ethics, peace, citizenship, human rights, democracy, and other universal values”.

·      “Studies and research, development of alternative technologies, production and distribution of information and technical and scientific knowledge related to the above-mentioned activities”.  

1.2.    In article 2 of the law are listed the activities an organization cannot carry out in order to apply for the status of OSCIP. For example, do not qualify commercial organizations, trade unions, political parties, cooperatives, public foundations, mutual benefit organizations, for-profit private hospitals and schools, insurance companies, Social Organizations (regulated by the law n° 9.637 of May 15, 1998). 

1.3.    The new OSCIP qualification is granted by the Ministry of Justice. This does not mean that this new regime will abrogate either the existing status of “public benefit societies” (which are governed by the law n° 91 of August 28, 1935 and the decree of May 2, 1961 and are granted tax preferences) or the acquisition of the “certificate of philanthropic purposes” (which is regulated by the decree n° 2.536 of April 6, 1998). According to article 18 of the law, it will be possible for a qualifying OSCIP to maintain simultaneously its old status and the new one, for a period of two years starting with the entry into force of the law. At the end of these two years, the organization will have to either choose to remain an OSCIP and therefore lose its prior status, or forego the status of OSCIP and keep its other status. 

1.4.    One of the motivations for the adoption of this new law was the implementation of mechanisms for self-regulation. Principles of self-regulation are adopted in article 4 of the law where it states that certain provisions must be reflected in the charter of an OSCIP:

·      adoption of practices preventing conflict of interest,

·      creation of a financial oversight council,

·      transfer of assets to a similar organization in case of liquidation,

·      transfer of the assets acquired from public funds to an other OSCIP in case of the loss of the qualification of OSCIP,

·      remuneration of directors on a free market basis. This is an innovation; according to article 1-c of the law on Public Benefit Societies (1935) and art. 2-b of the decree regulating this law (1961), directors serving on the board could not receive any remuneration. (Art. 6-c of the decree of 1961 states that in case of remuneration of the directors, the organization loses its public benefit status),

·      publication of financial reports. 

1.5.    The new decree helps solve a problem that had been raised by commentators on the draft law who recommended that a “semi-audit” be instituted for OSCIPs whose income fall below a certain threshold. Article 19 of the decree states that OSCIPs will need to carry out an independent audit if their income is equal or higher than R$ 600.000,00. This rule is also applicable to funds provided by the government to organizations involved in partnerships. 

2.       Partnerships between OSCIPs and the Government

2.1.    The new law establishes a framework for partnerships between OSCIPs and government bodies. Prior to this law, there were no norms for social service contracting, and NGOs had difficulty competing with business entities. The new law provides that cooperative partnerships can be established between the government and OSCIPs. Article 10 of the law describes which provisions should be stipulated in the agreement signed by both parties (e.g. the object, means to achieve the results, estimates on expenses and revenues, obligations of the organization, publication in the official journal of excerpts from the partnership agreement, and of an explanation of the operational and financial execution of the agreement, etc…) 

2.2.    The rules for government contracting with OSCIPs are stated in articles 23 through 31 of the decree of June 1999. The government body must open a competition bidding process containing certain minimum information (art. 25). Article 27 stipulates which criteria are to be used in the selection of an OSCIP, whereas article 28 stipulates which criteria are not acceptable for the selection of an OSCIP that wishes to engage in a partnership arrangement. The selection is made by a commission designated by the government body, which is composed at least of one member of the executive branch, an expert in the field of activity of the partnership, and a member of the public policy council[1], where applicable (art. 30). The provisions of article 31 does not allow for the decision of this commission to be bypassed by the government.  

2.3.    The law provides, in article 11, how the supervision of a partnership agreement is to be executed and by which bodies of government. An evaluation commission participates in monitoring the execution of the partnership agreement and analyzes its results. This commission is set up by both parties of the partnership (art. 11.1). It is composed of 2 members from the executive branch, 1 member from the OSCIP and, where applicable a member of the Public Policy Council of the field of activity related to the partnership (art. 20 of the decree of July 1999). Documents to be presented to the government at the end of each exercise are listed in article 12 of the decree.  

2.4.    The decree also describes the mechanisms for disbursement of resources by the government to a special bank account established for the partnership’s purpose (art. 14-15 of the decree). 

2.5.    Finally, sanctions for the misuse of goods and resources of public origin are provided for in article 13 of the law. The judge can decide on “the unavailability of the assets of the entity as well as on the sequestration of assets of the officers, as well as of public or third sector agent, who have enriched themselves illegally or have caused damage to public assets”. The public authorities will then manage the confiscated assets until the end of the legal action. 

By clarifying several issues, as indicated in this paper, the decree addresses a number of the concerns that had been raised regarding the possible implementation of law n° 9790. However, the decree overlooks further regulation necessary to the establishment of accounting procedures for non-profit entities as is referred to in article 4 (VII)(a) of the law. Further concerns have been raised regarding the tax benefits of OSCIPs, which would lose those they had acquired in a previous status. It is suggested that tax benefits for these new organizations need to be regulated[2].

 For a complete listing of Documents ICNL has in its documentation center on Brazil, Click Here!


COLOMBIA

           See also: the Code of Ethics for NGO's in Colombia (in Spanish)

DECLARACIÓN DE PRINCIPIOS DE LAS ORGANIZACIONES NO GUBERNAMENTALES (ONG) DE COLOMBIA

 

For a complete listing of Documents ICNL has in its documentation center on Colombia, Click Here!


VENEZUELA


International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
733 15th St. NW, Suite 420 - Washington, D.C 20005 Phone: (202) 624-0766 Fax: (202) 624-0767
E-Mail: infoicnl@icnl.org

All contents Copyright (c) 1999, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. All rights reserved.
Revised: July 22, 2004.