Table of Contents
Articles
Creative Uses of Program Related Investments
Milt Cerney
Redes y Redes de Redes
Miguel Angel Itriago Machado and Antonio L. Itriago Machado
The Katz Report - Finally a Reality
Sangoco
Recent Experiences with Re-Registering Foundations in the Czech Republic
Lenka Deverová and Petr Pajas
Canadian Developments
Arthur Drache
Creating an Enabling Environment for Private Philanthropy: the Role of Charity Law in Northern Ireland
Kerry O'Halloran
Establishing New Interactive Forms of Collaboration Between Non-Profit Organizations and Enterprises.- Competitive vs. Collaborative Relationships
Maria Beatriz Parodi Luna
Reflexionando sobre Consolidación de Organizaciones Cúpula de la Sociedad Civil en Venezuela
Charo Méndez
Reviews
Studies of – and prospects for the revision of the tax laws governing non profit organizations
By Fondazione Italiano per il Voluntario
Protecting Human Rights Defenders - Analysis of the newly adopted Declaration on Human Rights Defenders
By the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights
Las Asociaciones Civiles en el Derecho Venezolano (Qué son y cómo funcionan)
By Miguel Angel Itriago and Antonio L. Itriago
Reviewed by Caroline L. Newman
Philanthropy and Law in Asia
Edited by Thomas Silk
Case Notes
India:
CIT v Sri Gujarathi Mandal | CIT v Nagi Reddi Charity
France:
Association Eglise de Scientologie | Albert & others v Association club du chien-guide d'aveugles d'Ile de France
United Kingdom:
Varsani v Jesan | Singh v Bhasin | The Zoological Society of London v Customs & Excise / Dean & Canons of Windsor v Customs & Excise | National Trust v Hoare
United States:
United Cancer Council v Commissioner | In Re Bishop Estate
Country Reports
Asia Pacific:
Regional | Australia | China | New Zealand | Papua New Guinea | the Philippines | Singapore | Vietnam
Central and Eastern Europe:
Albania | Bulgaria | Croatia | Czech Republic | Hungary | Latvia | Lithuania | Macedonia | Romania | Slovakia
Latin America and the Caribbean:
Brazil | Columbia | Falkland Islands/ Malvinas | Peru | Venezuela
Middle East and North Africa:
Regional | Egypt | Kuwait | Morocco
Newly Independent States:
Armenia | Azerbaijan | Belarus | Georgia | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Moldova | Russia | Tajikistan | Turkmenistan | Ukraine | Uzbekistan
North America:
Canada | the United States
Sub-Saharan Africa:
Cameroon | Ethiopia | Ghana | South Africa
Western Europe:
Regional | Belgium | France | Germany | Republic of Ireland | Italy | Malta | Sweden | Switzerland | the United Kingdom
Self-Regulation Initiatives
Code of Conduct for NGOs In Ethiopia- A Review Article
Eddie Adiin Yaansah
International Grantmaking
What’s Behind the Foreign Public Charity Equivalence Affidavit?
Betsy Buchalter Adler and Ingrid Mittermaier
International Developments
International Fiscal Association Congress 1999
- - - - - - - - - -
CIT v Sri Gujarathi Manda
The High Court of Madras has held that, where a trust was established to impart knowledge and education primarily in a particular language (in this case Gujarati), exemption from income tax cannot be denied under section 13 (1) (b) Income Tax Act 1961 on the grounds that the trust is established to promote the interest of a particular religion or caste. (CIT v Sri Gujarathi Mandal, [1998] 101 Taxman 647 (Mad.))
CIT v Nagi Reddi Charity
Another case heard by the High Court of Madras concerned a trust established to provide medical relief and education to the poor and which received by way of gift an assignment of copyright in several films for which distribution arrangements had already been made, subject to the condition that amounts realised from the exploitation of the copyrights were to be held as part of the corpus of the trust until such time as they were utilised in constructing a hospital. The court held that the amounts received by the trust from the exploitation of the copyrights did not represent income derived from the carrying on of a business by the trust (for which exemption from income tax is denied under section 13 (1) (bb) Income Tax Act 1961)). The income fell to be treated as contributions to the corpus of the trust and thus did not constitute taxable income. (CIT v Nagi Reddi Charity, [1998] 101 Taxman 356 (Mad.))