ICNL logo

The International Journal
of Not-for-Profit Law

Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2001

A publication of the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law

Table of Contents

Letter from the Editor

Articles

The State, Laws and Nongovernmental Organizations in Bangladesh
By Mokbul Morshed Ahmad

China's Nongovernmental Organizations: Status, Government Policies, and Prospects for Further Development
By Guangyao Chen

The Czech Government and NGOs in 2001
By Petr Pajas

The Italian Legal System Relating to Not-for-Profit Organizations: A Historical and Evolutionary Overview
By Alceste Santuari

Reviews

The Legal System Between the State and Civil Society
By Jurgen Nautz, Emil Brix, and Gerhard Luf
Reviewed by Thomas Notter

Foundations of Charity
By Charles Mitchell and Susan R. Moody
Reviewed by Karla Simon

Case Notes

Middle East and North Africa:
Egypt

North America:
the United States

Country Reports

Asia Pacific:
Regional
| Australia | Cambodia | Indonesia | Japan

Central and Eastern Europe:
Regional | Albania | Lithuania

Latin America and the Caribbean:
Brazil | Chile | Venezuela

Middle East and North Africa:
Yemen

Newly Independent States:
Belarus

North America:
the United States

South Asia:
India

Sub-Saharan Africa:
Botswana
| Ghana | South Africa

Western Europe:
France | Germany

Self-Regulation Reports

Northern NGO Guidelines and Codes of Conduct: Conflicting Rights and Responsibilities?
By Julie Gale

Building Trust in NGOs
By Simon Heap

Nigeria: Draft Code of Standard Practice for NGOs

Switzerland: New Accounting Rules for Not-for-Profit Organizations (NPOs)

International Grantmaking

Bar Association Task Force Revisits Private Foundation Rules: Implication for Foreign Grantmaking
By Richard S. Gallagher

Donating to U.S. Charities
By Arthur B.C. Drache, Q.C.

The Council on Foundations Secures Information Letter that Permits Use of Expenditure Responsibility for Most International Grants

 

- - - - - - - - - -

Editorial Board

Country Reports: Western Europe

France

The Status of Political Activities of Associations and Foundations

By Caroline Newman, ICNL 

In France there are two categories of charitable organizations. Organizations can acquire charitable status under the administrative law or charitable status under the tax law. While both are essential to determine certain tax benefits, the administrative law grants certain benefits with regard to receipt of donations to the organizations that have acquired the administrative law charitable status. However, certain tax benefits available to not-for-profit organizations are often independent from their charitable status under both administrative law and tax law.

The term “charitable” in this synopsis refers to the common law understanding of charity, including the “fourth head,” i.e. public benefit. It should not be confused with the French literal translation of the term charitable organization: organismes à but caritatif or organismes de bienfaisance, which are organizations providing basic needs to the needy.

Tax Law: “Organizations of General Interest” are listed in art. 200 and 238bis of the Tax Code, but no jurisprudence exists in defining what is really “general interest”. The tax administration has attempted to give a more specific definition (Doc. Adm. 5 B-3311 n° 11 and following of July 20, 1994 and Doc. Adm. 4 C-712 n° 11 and following) in requiring that activities of such organizations be of not-for-profit purpose and be not addressed to a limited group of persons. Nothing in the tax law or its interpretative documents refers to any restrictions on political activities.

Administrative Law: Associations and foundations obtain recognition of “public benefit” status by the Conseil d’Etat (France’s Highest Administrative Court). In order to be recognized as a public benefit organization, an organization must:

Nothing in the law specifically says that a public benefit organization may not engage in political activities, but a decision by the Conseil d’Etat, (sect. Interior 18-12-1979 n° 326214) clarifies that organizations with a primarily political purpose-- such as engaging primarily in political advocacy-- cannot be recognized as public benefit organizations. (Political organizations cannot be considered to be carrying out activities of general interest and therefore do not qualify for the status).

Political organizations cannot qualify for charitable status under either the tax law or the administrative law. As a result, if the political activities of a charitable organization were to increase to the extent that the administrative authorities would consider it to be in violation of its charter, the organization would risk losing its charitable status.

Finally, it should be noted that the French law provides associations financing political parties and electoral campaigns with a special privilege similar to that granted to organizations with administrative charitable status – they are permitted to receive donations made by will. (In France only Associations et Fondations Reconnues d’Utilité Publique, as well as associations for financing political parties and elections are permitted to be recipients of post mortem donations. However, they are liable for on inheritance tax on these donations. Declared associations may only receive in vivos donations, and these are exempt as long as the donations are allocated to exempt activities). Strictly political organizations (i.e., pure advocacy organizations) only benefit from some VAT exemptions and certain qualified exemptions from the commercial tax if they meet specific requirements).

Germany

The Status of Political Activities of Associations and Foundations

By Karla Simon, ICNL Senior Legal Consultant

Like most civil law countries, Germany has two types of not-for-profit organizations that may generally engage in what the common law refers to as charity. These are the association (Verein), referred to in the Bundesgesetzbuch (BGB) 1; 21 ff, and the foundation (Stiftung), referred to in BGB 1; 80 ff. It is also possible to register not-for-profit organizations in the GmbH (limited liability) or AG (stock company) corporate forms, but there is no need to go into those details for purposes of this short synopsis.

Although the law is very complex with regard to the administration of the typical registered association or foundation in Germany (some flavor of which can be obtained from the general papers attached to this note on political activities), the specific treatment of political activities can be found only in two places in German law. There are restrictions in the civil law regarding associations and there are restrictions in the tax law regarding all corporate bodies that are involved in charitable and public benefit activities.

The civil law restrictions set out in the Association Law (Vereinsgesetz) are really quite limited and apply only to registered associations with a significant number or foreign persons as members or leaders. The Association Law contains the more elaborated set of legal provisions applicable to associations described in the BGB and registered according to the provisions thereof. In § 14 of that law, associations with a significant number of foreigners as members or leaders are forbidden to engage in political activities that might harm the internal or external security or the internal order of Germany or its states. The exact extent to which this has been applied is unclear, but it is nevertheless the rule.

The tax law restrictions are more interesting, because they apply to all corporate organizations that engage in public benefit activities. Here the situation is a bit complex when one compares it with common law jurisdictions, because the tax law (Abgabenordnung or AO) refers to “charitable” (mildtaetige), “public benefit” (gemeinnuetzige), and “religious” (kirchliche) purposes, and defines each of them with a list of permitted purposes. While the term “charitable” in AO § 53 permits a fairly limited group of purposes, e.g., organizations that care for the sick, the handicapped, the homeless, etc.,[1] the “public benefit” term used in AO § 52 more nearly encompasses the broader range of purposes referred to as the fourth head of charity in the common law system. In addition, AO § 54, which deals with religious activities, comprises many that would be encompassed within the second head of charity referred to by Pemsel’s case.

In this discussion, therefore, the “public benefit” category is treated as essentially defining the concept of charity under consideration. The major reason for this is that this category has some restrictions with respect to political activities, while the other two do not. In fact, however, there is a built-in logic to this treatment – most Germans would not think that an organization providing a home for the homeless would engage in any prohibited political activity as described below. Nor would an organization that trains clergy. Thus, providing the limits on political activities ONLY for the broader “public benefit” class (akin to the common law fourth head) makes a lot of sense.

The restrictions on political activities of tax exempt “public benefit” organizations are found in the regulations interpreting the AO § 52 (Anwendungserlass zur Abgabenordnung -- AEAO 800). These regulations state quite clearly that political purposes “are fundamentally not” public benefit purposes. On the other hand, “political” is fairly narrowly defined by the regulations. Although it specifically includes trying to influence public opinion and supporting political parties, the regulations go on to say that a certain amount of “influencing public opinion” is permissible for “public benefit” organizations. In fact, it is permissible so long as the accomplishment of a public benefit purpose is linked with setting a political goal, and the actual attempts to influence the political parties and the state are not foremost in what the organization does. The regulations go on to cite a specific case, which held that an organization could take a specific political position, consistent with its public benefit purposes, so long as that was not its primary activity. In contrast, an organization that has the political goal as its only or its primary purpose would fail as a public benefit organization.

The regulations also cite case authority making it clear that public benefit organizations must not engage in illegal activities nor engage in certain types of passive resistance activities against the orders of the police. There is, however, no statement about electioneering activities, per se, although is seems probable that such activities would be considered to be within the general rule regarding activities that “influence public opinion.”

The rules are thus quite unrestrictive and would seem to permit considerable purpose-related advocacy and lobbying. One other interesting thing should be noted – Although German charities are not permitted to support political parties, political parties are permitted to support charities. In fact, each political party has a charitable foundation, which does lots of good works, both in Germany and abroad. 

[1] These do receive greater tax benefits, e.g., a higher limit on deductible donations.

 

Copyright © 2012 The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL)
ISSN: 1556-5157