Because of Peru’s history of military rule, democratic instability, and corruption, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have played an important role in national development. Although NGOs have long existed in Peru, an NGO boom truly began in the 1970s under the government of Juan Velasco Alverado, due to an atmosphere conducive to reform.
The re-emergence of a democratic government in the 1980s led to a second proliferation of NGOs focused on grassroots issues. Because of the political environment in which many of these organizations emerged, they were committed to the idea of development that did not originate from a top-down approach. Nonetheless, high levels of corruption, particularly under the Fujimori government in the 1990s, coupled with a politically-left NGO community, has led to frequent tensions between NGOs and the government and crackdowns on NGO activities for several decades.
Currently, the regulatory framework in civil matters in Peru generally remains quite flexible; however, there is no state policy of granting non-profit organizations tax benefits. As a result, not-for-profit organizations, especially NGOs, have problems in finding financial and long-term sustainability. Nonetheless, NGOs tend to have a presence on issues related to social inclusion, environment, human rights, democracy, rural development, and anti-corruption. In addition, indigenous communities and rural populations have taken up causes related to socio-environmental claims.
One of the most important and recurring issues involving the regulatory framework of the not-for-profit sector in Peru is related to the scope of state supervision of NGOs’ receipt of foreign funding (international cooperation). This topic has continued to be prominent as evidenced by several directives of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI) on requirements for renewal of NGO registration by APCI, which were modified in 2016. Renewal procedures for registering local NGOs and foreign organizations (ENIEX) with the APCI have now been eliminated; thus NGOs and ENIEX registration before APCI now lasts indefinitely, but are subject supervision of APCI.
Social conflicts and protests are increasing in Peru. According to the Ombudsman’s Office, social movements involve not only socio-environmental protests, but also those against the government from, among others, heavy cargo carriers and agrarian organizations. There are also conflicts in Lima where groups of citizens and unions are demanding solutions to the rise in the costs of basic food products.
|Registration Body||Public Registry||Public Registry and Supervisory Council on Foundations||Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation|
|Barriers to Entry||Lack of uniform registration criteria||N/A||N/A|
|Barriers to Activities||Excessive government control under International Cooperation Laws|
|Barriers to Speech and/or Advocacy||Government is hostile to unpopular groups|
|Barriers to International Contact||Excessive government control under International Cooperation Laws|
|Barriers to Resources||Excessive government control under International Cooperation Laws|
|Barriers to Assembly||Advanced notification required for “political gatherings”|
|Population||32,275,736 (2022 est.)|
|Type of Government||Constitutional Republic|
|Life Expectancy at Birth||68.94 years (2021 est.): Male 65.38 years; Female 72.67 years (2022 est.)|
|Literacy Rate||Male: 97%; Female: 92% (2020 est.)|
|Religious Groups||Roman Catholic 60%, Christian 14.6% (includes evangelical 11.1%, other 3.5%), other .3%, none 4%, unspecified 21.1% (2017 est.)|
|Ethnic Groups||Mestizo (mixed Amerindian and white) 60.2%, Amerindian 25.8%, White 5.9%, African descent 3.6%,Other (includes Chinese and Japanese descent) 1.2%, Unspecified 3.3% (2017 est.).|
|GDP per capita||$12,500 (2021 est.)|
Source: The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.
|Ranking Body||Rank||Ranking Scale
(best – worst possible)
|UN Human Development Index||84 (2021)||1 – 189|
|World Justice Project Rule of Law Index||90 (2022)||1 – 140|
|Transparency International||105 (2021)||1 – 180|
|Foreign Policy: Fragile States Index||87 (2022)||179 – 1|
|Freedom House: Freedom in the World||Status: Free
Political Rights: 30
Civil Liberties: 42 (2022)
|Free/Partly Free/Not Free
1 – 40
1 – 60
International and Regional Human Rights Agreements
|Key International Agreements||Ratification*||Year|
|International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)||Yes||1978|
|Optional Protocol to ICCPR (ICCPR-OP1)||Yes||1980|
|International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)||Yes||1978|
|Optional Protocol to ICESCR (OP-ICESCR)||No||—|
|International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)||Yes||1971|
|Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)||Yes||1982|
|Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women||Yes||2001|
|Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)||Yes||1990|
|International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (ICRMW)||Yes||2005|
|Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)||Yes||2008|
|American Convention on Human Rights||Yes||1978|
|Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights “Protocol of San Salvador”||Yes||1995|
* Category includes ratification, accession, or succession to the treaty
Article 2 ¶13 of the Constitution of Peru recognizes the right of every person to join and establish foundations and various forms of legally recognized non-profit organizations, without prior authorization in accordance with the law. In addition, the Constitution stipulates that these organizations cannot be dissolved by administrative decision.
Peru’s Constitution also recognizes, among other internationally recognized rights:
- the right to equality before the law (no person should be discriminated against because of origin, race, sex, language, religion, opinion, economic status or any other factor) (Article 2 ¶2);
- freedom of conscience and religion, individually or collectively (no one may be persecuted for their ideas or beliefs, or opinion) (Article 2 ¶3);
- freedom of information, opinion, expression and dissemination of ideas through spoken or written word or image, by any media, without prior authorization or censorship or impediment (Article 2 ¶4);
- the right to privacy, and the inviolability of one’s communications and documents (Article 2 ¶¶ 7 and 10);
- freedom of contract (Article 62);
- property rights (Articles 70-73);
- the right to participate, individually or collectively, in the political, economic, social and culture of the Nation (Article 2 ¶17); and
- the right to freedom of peaceful assembly is also protected by Article 2 of the Constitution, section 12, which states that “Every person has the right to gather peacefully without arms”.
National Laws and Regulations Affecting Sector
As a unitary State, Peru has a national legal framework that follows the civil law tradition. Civil society organizations (CSOs) are primarily regulated by the Civil Code.
Relevant laws, many of which are in ICNL’s Online Library, include:
- Civil Code of 1984. Código Civil Peruano de 1984. Derecho de las Personas, Sección Segunda: Personas Jurídicas, Artículos 76 al 139
- Law of International Technical Cooperation (Ley de Cooperación Técnica Internacional): Decreto Legislativo No. 719 (noviembre 1991). Modificada parcialmente por el Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1451 (septiembre 2018). Reglamento aprobado por: Decreto Supremo Nº 015-92-PCM (enero 1992).
- Decreto Supremo Nº 130-2018-PCM (diciembre 2018) sobre ratificación de procedimientos administrativos en diversas entidades pública. Elimina los procedimientos de renovación en los registros de ONGD (Ongs locales) y ENIEX (entidades extranjeras de cooperación técnica internacional) de APCI.
- Law on the Creation of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation. Ley de Creación de la Agencia Peruana de Cooperación Internacional: Ley No. 27692 (abril 2002) modificado parcialmente por el Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1451 (septiembre 2018).
- Directives of APCI for the registration and Renewal of the Registries of NGO and ENIEX before APCI: Resolución Directoral Ejecutiva Nro. 067-2011-APCI-DE, modificada por las RDE Nros. 085-2015-APCI/DE, 068-2016-APCI/DE, 073-2016-APCI/DE y 130-2016-APCI/DE
- Income Tax Law. Texto Unico Ordenado de la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta. Texto Unico Ordenado de la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta. Decreto Supremo No. 179-2004-EF (diciembre 2004). Artículo 19 inciso b) modificado por Decreto Legislativo No. 1120 (julio 2012) y normas modificatorias. Ampliación de plazo exoneración del Impuesto a la Renta en favor de asociaciones y fundaciones hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2018 (Artículo 19 inciso b Ley Impuesto a la Renta): Ley N° 30404 (diciembre 2015). Mediante Ley N° 30898 (diciembre del 2018) se amplió la exoneración hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2019. Ampliacion de la exoneración hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2020 mediante Decreto de Urgencia N° 025-2019 (diciembre 2019). Nueva ampliación exoneración Impuesto a la Renta hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2023, mediante Ley N° 31106 (31 de diciembre del 2020).
- General Sales Tax Law. Texto Unico Ordenado de la Ley del Impuesto General a las Ventas e Impuesto Selectivo al Consumo: Decreto Supremo No. 055-99-EF (abril 1999) y normas modificatorias.
- Refund of General Sales Tax and Municipal Promotion Tax. Reglamentan la aplicación del beneficio tributario de devolución de impuestos pagados en las compras de bienes y servicios efectuadas con financiación de donaciones y Cooperación Técnica Internacional No Reembolsable: Decreto Legislativo No. 783 (diciembre 1993). Reglamento aprobado por Decreto Supremo No. 36-94-EF (abril 1994). Ley N° 30404 (diciembre 2015) amplia beneficio hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2018. Mediante Ley Nro. 30899 (29 de diciembre del 2018) se prorroga hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2019 este beneficio tributario. Ampliación de exoneración hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2020 mediante Decreto de Urgencia Nro. 024-2019 (diciembre 2019). Nueva ampliación de esta exoneración hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2021 mediante Ley N° 31105 (31 de diciembre del 2020.) Se amplía la exoneración hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2024 mediante Decreto Legislativo N° 1519 (publicado el 30 de diciembre del 2021).
- Law on Facilitation of the Dispatch of Goods Donated from Overseas. Ley de facilitación del despacho de mercancías donadas provenientes del exterior:Ley No. 28905 (noviembre 2006). Reglamento: Decreto Supremo No. 021-2008-EF (febrero 2008)
- Ley General de Aduanas: Decreto Legislativo Nº 1053 (junio 2008) Reglamento: Decreto Supremo Nro. 010-2009-EF (enero 2009). Modificado parcialmente por la Ley N° 30498 (agosto 2016) en lo relativo a la inafectación a importación de bienes donados
- Regulation on the Inapplicability of VAT/GST and Excise Tax to Donations. Aprueban Reglamento para la Inafectación del IGV, ISC y derechos arancelarios a las Donaciones: Decreto Supremo No. 096-2007-EF (julio 2007). Modificado por Decreto Supremo N º 54-2017-EF (marzo 2017)
- Ley que promueve la donación de alimentos y facilita el transporte de donaciones en situaciones de Desastres Naturales: Ley Nro. 30498 (Agosto 2016). Modifica la Ley del Impuesto General a las Ventas en lo relativo a importación y transferencia de bienes donados (Art. 2 inciso K) y la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta (Art. 37 inciso x.1.) en lo relativo a deducibilidad gastos donaciones de alimentos. Decreto Supremo Nro. 055-2017-EF: Reglamento de la Ley Nro. 30498 (Marzo 2017).
- Ley que amplía el límite de deducibilidad de gastos por concepto de donaciones de alimentos en buen estado para efectos del Impuesto a la Renta: Ley Nº 30631 (agosto 2017, en vigencia a partir del 1 de enero del 2018).
- Regulation on Registration of Legal Persons: Reglamento de Inscripciones del Registro de Personas Jurídicas:Resolución de Superintendente Nacional de los Registros Públicos No. 038-2013-SUNARP-SN (febrero 2013)
- Ley Nro. 29334 ha sido derogada. Actual Ley de Organización y Funciones del Ministerio del Interior: DECRETO LEGISLATIVO Nº 1266.
Other regulatory measures include:
- Directive 0009-2015-ONAGI sobre Otorgamiento de Garantías Inherentes al Orden Público (on Specific Aspects Granting Guarantees on Public Order);
- Law on Transparency and Access to Public Information: Law 27806:Texto Único Ordenado de la Ley Nº 27806, Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública: Decreto Supremo Nº 021-2019-JUS
- Decreto Legislativo No. 1353 on Modifications to the Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information and Creation of National Public Authority for that Purpose (January 2017);
- Ley de Organizaciones Políticas: Law N°28094 y normas modificatorias
- Ley General de Elecciones: Law 26859 y normas modificatorias.
Anti-money laundering activities (Lavado de Activos) are regulated by the following:
- Decreto Legislativo de lucha eficaz contra el lavado de activos y otros delitos relacionados a la minería ilegal y crimen organizado: LegislativoNº 1106 y normas modificatorias (últimas modificatorias dispuestas mediante Ley N° 31178 de abril del 2021);
- Ley que crea la Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera – Perú: LeyNº 27693. Reglamento aprobado por Decreto Supremo Nro. 020-2017-JUS;
- Norma para la Prevención del Lavado de Activos y Financiamiento del Terrorismo, de aplicación general a los sujetos obligados a informar que carecen de organismos supervisores : Resolución SBSNº 486-2008 y normas modificatorias.
- Norma para la Prevención del Lavado de Activos y Financiamiento del Terrorismo, de aplicación general a los sujetos obligados a informar que carecen de organismos supervisores : Resolución SBS Nº 486-2008 (march 2008) y normas modificatorias. Resolución SBS N° 369- 2018 (january 2018): Aprueban la Norma para la prevención del lavado de activos y del financiamiento del terrorismo aplicable a los sujetos obligados bajo el sistema acotado de prevención del lavado de activos y del financiamiento del terrorismo aplicable, entre otras, a “Las organizaciones sin fines de lucro (OSFL) que recauden, transfieran y desembolsen fondos, recursos u otros activos para fines o propósitos caritativos, religiosos, culturales, educativos, científicos, artísticos, sociales, recreativos o solidarios o para la realización de otro tipo de acciones u obras altruistas o benéficas, siempre que no faciliten créditos, microcréditos o cualquier otro tipo de financiamiento económico.”
Please note that there are three important websites that have an updated and detailed section of legislation:
- Tax legislation: sunat.gob.pe
- APCI: apci.gob.pe (Section Normativa APCI)
- Money laundering: Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros: (Sección “Prevención Lavado de Activos”)
Pending NGO Legislative / Regulatory Initiatives
1. Peru has made legal modifications in order to preventmoney laundering and terrorist financingby not-for-profit organizations. However, according to the evaluation carried out by El Grupo de Acción Financiera de Latinoamérica (GAFILAT) in 2018, Peru’s efforts have not been sufficient. The GAFILAT Mutual Evaluation Report for Peru, published in March 2019, concluded that: a) “Peru has not yet done a risk analysis of the non-profit organizations that identifies which subgroup of organizations is framed within the definition of the non-profit entity of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and has not used all available information resources in order to identify the characteristics and types of nonprofit organizations that, according to their activities or characteristics, have a probable risk of abuse for the Financing of Terrorism. b) Peru has not identified the nature of the threats posed by terrorist entities to non-profit organizations that could be at risk, as well as the way in which terrorist actors could abuse these organizations.” Therefore, Recommendation 8 of GAFILAT considered Peru to be “Partially Compliant.”
Through Executive Director Resolution 033-2021 / APCI-DE, the APCI Annual Supervision Plan 2021 (PAS) was approved. Specific objectives include: “To supervise the interventions and donations made with resources from the International Technical Cooperation, under the prevention approach in matters of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing, as well as the designation of the Compliance Officer.”
2. With the signatures of President Pedro Castillo and Prime Minister Aníbal Torres, the call for the Constituent Assembly to hold a referendum was submitted to the Congress on April 25, 2022. If the referendum passes, the Constituent Assembly would have the task of drafting within nine months a new Constitution, which would then also be subject to referendum. This initiative would require a modification of article 207 of the Peruvian Constitution and would require the inclusion in the municipal elections of October 2022 of a special question on this matter. The Constitution and Regulations Commission of the Congress filed this draft for the modification of the Peruvian Constitution in May 2022.
The legal forms of civil society organization (CSOs), or non-profit legal entities, regulated by the Civil Code in Peru include the association, the foundation, and the committee. The most common classification is the association, while the committee is the least used classification due to its specific and temporary duration.
According to the Civil Code, an association is legally defined as “an organization established by two people or legal entities or both, that through a common activity pursue a non-profit objective,” and may define a public or social purpose. Thus, an association could be a beach club, cultural group, or philanthropic entity.
A foundation, on the other hand, is defined in the Civil Code as a “non-profit organization established by the assignment of one or more legal or natural personalities to accomplish objectives that are of religious, cultural, welfare, or other social interest.” In addition, an initial contribution of money or property is a prerequisite to establishing a foundation. Since the purpose of a foundation must be social in nature, private interest groups seeking to obtain benefits for themselves are not allowed to form this legal entity. Foundations are established less often than associations because there are many drawbacks, including being subject to more state control and supervision.
Associations in Peru are free to pursue any lawful mutual or public benefit purpose. Foundations, on the other hand, must pursue religious, aid-based, or cultural objectives, or other objectives of social interest. The Civil Code does not define the term “social interest.”
A non-governmental organization, or NGO, is a not-for-profit organization that receives a special designation as an NGO because it engages in “international technical cooperation” activities that are related to the receipt of foreign funding. However, there is no legal identification for NGOs, so they are considered de facto civil associations.
Public Benefit Status
Associations and foundations are not automatically exempt from income tax payments. Instead, they must apply to the Peruvian Tax Agency (Superintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria-SUNAT) and register with the Register for Income Tax Exempt Entities (Registro de Entidades Exoneradas del Impuesto a la Renta). In practice, this tax exemption is quite restrictive and difficult to obtain.
However, qualifying NGOs can receive benefits from income tax in the following ways:
1. Immunity- For foundations, the following exclusive purposes are not subject to income tax: culture, advanced research, charity, social and medical assistance, and social benefits for company employees (Article 18 Subsection c of the Income Tax Law).
2. Exoneration- For associations and other types of foundations (not eligible for the above immunity), a temporary exoneration (Article 19(b) of the Income Tax Law) is established by Law No. 30404, which was published on December 30, 2015 and extended until December 31, 2019 (Law No. 30898, December 28, 2018), “if they comply with the following requirements: (i) exclusive pursuit of the following purposes: charity, social assistance, education; cultural, science, art, literature, athletics, politics, union/trade-unions or housing; (ii) the qualifying activities are carried out within Peru; (iii) no distribution, directly or indirectly, among the associates or members; and (iv) the organization’s governing documents must state that, in the event of dissolution, assets must be directed to any of the purposes included in this article.” The requirement that an organization include the dissolution provision in its governing documents does not apply to those organizations registered in APCI’s Registry of Foreign Organizations or Institutions of International Technical Cooperation (ENIEX). The last extension was established by Decreto de Urgencia Nro. 025-2019 (December 2019), which extended the exemption for associations and foundations until December 31, 2020. The last extension was provided by Law N° 31106 (December 31, 2020) that extended this exemption in favor of associations and foundations until December 31, 2023.
Article 19(b) of Decreto Legislativo No. 1120 (in force from January 1, 2013) was modified to be more precise on issues related to the non-distribution of incomes directly or indirectly to associates or members or linked parties. It also establishes what the Tax Administration (Superintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria-SUNAT) will consider to be indirect distribution of incomes, such as the delivery of money and goods not subject to subsequent tax control. If the SUNAT verifies that an entity distributes, directly or indirectly, incomes, then the SUNAT will exclude (“dar de baja”) the entity from the Income Tax Exemption Registry and will cancel the resolution of the entity eligible to receive tax-deductible donations. The foundation or association will not be eligible for the income tax exemption in that taxable year or the following taxable year, but after two taxable years, the entity can submit a new registration before the Tax Administration.
Associations and foundations that do not qualify for either immunity or exoneration of income tax are taxed as corporations based on their net income (annual fee). Per Legislative Decree No. 1261 of December 10, 2016 on the Modifications to the Income Tax Law, the new rate for corporations and taxpayers of the “third category” (rentas empresariales) is 29.50%. This new rate entered into force on January 1, 2017.
The Constitution of Peru recognizes the fundamental right of every person “to participate, individually or in association, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the nation.” (Article 2(17)) The Constitution also generally recognizes that people have a right to freedom of information (Article 2(4)); to request information from any public entity, with certain exceptions (Article 2(5)); to make written petitions individually or collectively to the competent authority, which is required to give a written response to the person concerned within the statutory period or face legal liability (Article 2(20)).
Several laws provide for citizen access to public information, including the publication of draft laws and dissemination of laws, which can be found through online government portals:
- General Administrative Procedure Act No. 27444 (Ley del Procedimiento Administrativo General);
- Framework Act for Modernization of State Management Act No. 27658 (Ley Marco de Modernización de la Gestión del Estado) (Article 5(b));
- Transparency and Freedom of Public Information Act No. 27806 (Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública);
- Supreme Decree No. 001-2009-JUS: Regulation establishing provisions related to the publication of legislative bills and the dissemination of general legislation.
Act No. 26300 on the Rights of Participation and Civilian Control (Ley de los derechos de participación y control ciudadanos) governs the rights of citizen participation and oversight. This Act recognizes that citizens have a right to participate in: (a) bills for constitutional reform; (b) bills for the creation of laws; (c) referenda; (d) bills for regional ordinances and municipal ordinances; and (e) other participation mechanisms provided under current legislation. Act No. 26300 also provides that citizens have the right to challenge authorities with respect to budget spending and the use of their own resources and that the authorities are required to reply. (Article 31).
NGOs have participated in several policy instruments or in processes established by law and policy instruments, including:
- The National Strategic Planning System (SINAPLAN) and the National Strategic Planning Center (CEPLAN), which were created under Legislative Decree No. 1088 of June 2008.
- The National Accord, signed in 2002 by both governmental and NGO representatives, is a “set of State policies developed and approved through dialogue and consensus-building following a process of nationwide workshops and consultations in order to plot a course toward the country’s sustainable development and consolidate its democratic governance” (acodonacional.pe).
- The National Plan for Integrity and Anti-Corruption 2018-2021, approved by Supreme Decree No. 044-2018-PCM.
Several other laws are relevant to civic participation. Notably, the Decentralization Framework Act (Ley de Bases de la Descentralización) No. 27783 provides that “regional and local governments are required to promote citizen participation in the formulation, discussion and negotiation of their development plans and budgets, and in public management. (…)”. (Article 17) In particular, it establishes coordination of the public and private sector through participatory plans and budgets. (Article 18)
The Regional Governments Organizational Act (Ley Orgánica de Gobiernos Regionales) No. 27867 includes “guiding principles of policies and regional management” that include “citizen participation in the stages of formulation, monitoring, auditing, and evaluation of the work of government and the execution of regional plans, budgets and projects, and public accountability, as well as in effectuating coordinated regional development plans and projects.” (Article 8) In addition, regional governments are competent (under the Constitution) to formulate and approve regional development plans coordinated with the municipalities and civil society. (Article 9)
The Participatory Budget Framework Act No. 28056 and its Regulation (Ley Marco del Presupuesto Participativo y su Reglamento), Supreme Decree No. 142-2009-EF, include participation as one of the “guiding principles.” Regional and local (municipal) governments must promote the development of mechanisms and strategies for civil society’s involvement in the programming of their budgets, in accordance with their coordinated development plans, and for overseeing and auditing the management of public resources.
Through Supreme Decree No. 168-2020-PCM, which was published on October 11, 2020, competent Ministries must establish “coordination mechanisms” with regional governments, local governments, other entities, and civil society, as required or appropriate according to the nature of each policy.” As this is a recent decree, it is premature to assess its impact.
Further, there are laws relating to the participation of marginalized social groups, including:
- Act No. 29785 on indigenous communities and native groups;
- The Elderly Act No. 30490, (Ley de la Persona Adulta Mayor);
- Children and Adolescents Code Act No. 27337 (Código del Niño y de los Adolescentes);
- Gender Equality Act No. 28983 (Article 6);
- General Act on People with Disabilities No. 29973 (Ley General de la Persona con Discapacidad) (Articles 6, 14)
In addition, Law 31494 of June 16, 2022 recognizes self-defense and rural development committees, which are legal entities and are registered in local registries. The Law further incorporates them into the citizen security system and regulates their legal treatment and considers them as civil, peaceful, and democratic organizations that organize themselves to influence peasant, native and rural populations, carry out activities to support sustainable development and citizen security, and participate in the maintenance of internal order and national defense.
However, in August 2022, the Ombudsman of Peru (Defensoría del Pueblo de Perú) filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Law 31494 on the grounds that it violates the individual and collective fundamental rights of indigenous communities, including infringing on their right to citizen protection and ignoring norms and standards regarding the use of force. Critics of the Law, for example, believe extractive companies use para-military groups as “self-defense committees” to crack down on individuals who protest against their projects, including among indigenous groups. As of January 2023, the lawsuit remains pending.
Indeed, a key barrier to public participation is the frequent criminalization of protests by social movements or rural and indigenous communities against extractive industries, such as mining (See Reports of Social Conflicts published by the Peruvian Ombudsman’s Office and the “Barriers to Assembly” section below).
Barriers to Entry
The Civil Code offers very little regulation of associations. As a result, there is a margin of interpretation and discretion for the Public Registry in each jurisdiction. In fact, the criteria for registration vary between each registrar. To address this problem, the Full Court of Registration adopted mandatory procedures based on precedent, which are published in the Official Diary, “El Peruano.” However, the Register of Non-Corporative Legal Entities (“ Reglamento de Inscripciones del Registro de Personas Jurídicas No Societarias”: Resolución de la Superintendente Nacional de los Registros Públicos No. 086-2009-SUNARP-SN), which contains regulations on registration of not-for-profit organizations, was modified and replaced by a new regulation on registration of legal entities called “Reglamento de Inscripciones del Registro de Personas Jurídicas”, which was approved in February 2013. This regulation addresses various aspects related to the registration procedures of not-for-profit organizations in Peru and regulates the acts related to registration, including:
a) The constitutive act of the legal entity, its bylaws, and its modifications;
b) The recognition of a legal entity registered abroad;
c) The establishment of branches and any registrable act linked to them;
d) The appointment of members of social organs, liquidators, and the other representatives or proxies and the acceptance, removal, suspension, resignation, granting of powers, modification, revocation, substitution, delegation and resumption of them as well as other acts included in its regulations;
e) The merger, transformation and other forms of reorganization of legal entities;
f) The dissolution and agreements of the liquidators and the extinction of legal entities.
On the other hand, regarding NGOs and ENIEX, in May 2015 APCI issued the Resolución Directoral Ejecutiva N° 085-2015-APCI-DE, which modified the requirements for renewal of the registration of NGOs and ENIEX. As a result, these entities had to be supervised by the APCI when they used resources that were considered to be International Cooperation Non-Refundable (CINR). Furthermore, an amendment to the Resolución mandated that NGOs and ENIEX must comply with the APCI’s monitoring and have a current RUC (Registro Unico de Contribuyente). On December 2016, however, APCI issued Resolución Directoral Ejecutiva Nº 130-2016/APCI-DE, which eliminated the requirements for NGOs and ENIEX to be supervised by APCI and to comply with the recommendations made as a result of the supervisory actions of APCI (that were established by Resolución Directoral Ejecutiva Nº 085-2015-APCI-DE). With the passing of Supreme Decree No. 130-2008-PCM (December 2018), the renewal procedures of the registries of local NGOs and ENIEX by APCI have been eliminated and, therefore, one-time registration will last indefinitely. In compliance with this legal norm APCI has removed from its website the Registers Section, which was the item related to Renewal of Registries for NGOs and ENIEX, and in practice it has proceeded to notify registered organizations of the legal changes.
Barriers to Operational Activity
The most significant legal barrier that NGOs have recently faced is the excessive control of resources administered by the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI). Under the legal framework, NGOs or any other group subject to the supervision and control of APCI must, among other responsibilities, provide extensive reporting about planned activities, sources of funding, and other financial details.
Although a limited regime for the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing for not-for-profit entities that do not carry out financing activities has been established in Peru, the regulation related to this issue should be improved so that such regulation does not constitute an excessive burden (not proportional, according to FATF/GAFI Recommendation 8). In this regard the Mutual Evaluation Report (Informe de Evaluación Mutua del Perú) of GAFILAT published in March 21, 2019 concluded that Peru has not done a risk analysis of not-for-profit organizations that identify which organizations are vulnerable to the abuses of terrorist financing and money laundering, in accordance with FATF (GAFI) Recommendation 8. (See Section Pending NGO Legislative/Regulatory Initiatives for more details.)
In addition, according to a report of the National Risk Evaluation of Money Laundering 2021, which was published by the Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros y AFP´s del Peru, there is “deficient regulation of NPOS and the presence of multiple supervisors in ML/FT matters.
Barriers to Speech / Advocacy
Although Peruvian law does not prohibit NGOs from engaging in activities linked to politics or lobbying or other activities that might influence public policy, there has been a continuous effort by state and non-state actors to silence unpopular groups. Former President Fujimori’s supporters in Congress, as well as some top government officials, have aggressively sought to discredit NGOs that advocate for human rights accountability. In addition, according to Human Rights Watch in 2019, “threats to freedom of expression continue to be a concern in Perú.” The Government of Pedro Castillo has also had a very tense relationship with the media. The Press and Society Institute (IPYS) and the Peruvian Press Council (CPP) have issued alerts about attacks against journalists.
Barriers to International Contact
There are no legal restrictions to international contact. As explained in the following section, however, there are barriers to resources from external sources.
Barriers to Resources
The Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI) was created through the Law on the Creation of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (Ley de Creación de la Agencia Peruana de Cooperación Internacional: Ley No. 27692) in 2002. Since that time, there has been significant controversy regarding the scope of state supervision over domestic and foreign organizations that finance or implement projects using international technical cooperation resources. Until 2006, registration with APCI was mandatory only for organizations that engaged in international technical cooperation (receiving funding from foreign sources) channeled through state agencies.
Law No. 28925, enacted in 2006, modified the Law for the Creation of APCI. Specifically, Law No. 28925 expanded APCI’s power to regulate organizations that either (1) receive international funding from state agencies (including both bilateral and multilateral entities of which Peru is a member), or (2) manage international cooperation without state involvement while also enjoying any privilege, benefit, tax exemption or use of state resources (national or foreign, as regulated by Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1451)..
Law No. 28925 drew widespread criticism domestically and internationally. Critics asserted that the law violated basic fundamental rights: namely the freedom of association, the freedom of privacy, and equality of law, among others. As a result, two groups, including one comprised of civil society representatives and one comprised of legislators, lodged two separate constitutional lawsuits in 2007. The combined lawsuits were settled by the Constitutional Court of Peru when it struck down several provisions of the law but upheld the majority of the law. The most important part of the ruling for civil society was the Court’s finding that registration with APCI is not obligatory for those organizations that do not accept any state benefits or use any state resources. In practice, however, opting out may not be that simple because nearly every organization utilizes state resources in some manner. The law also fails to define terms such as “state resources,” which gives the government wide discretion to exercise control over numerous organizations.
Barriers to Assembly
Article 2, section 12 of the Constitution protects the right to freedom of peaceful assembly (“Every person has the right to gather peacefully without arms”). To date, however, no specific Peruvian law regulates the right of assembly. That said, the Ministry of Interior requires organizers of “Public Gatherings (meetings, marches, parades, processions, feasts and religious services)” to comply with advance notification requirements, as described in the “Advance Notification” section below. This was stipulated by Directive 04-2011-10-1501 (“Provisions pertaining to the granting of guarantees for public gatherings, sporting and non-sporting public shows, and social events”), which was approved by Directorial Resolution number 2492-2011-IN-1501 on April 12, 2011. The Directive was updated by the new Directive 0009-2015-ONAGI “Sobre Otorgamiento de Garantías Inherentes al Orden Público (on Specific Aspects Granting Guarantees on Public Order).”
On December 7, 2005 the Constitutional Court issued a judgment (Petition for Constitutional Relief dossier number 4677-2004-PA/TC-LIMA-Confederación General de Trabajadores del Perú), in which the Court proposed “to the Congress of the Republic, the issuance of a law to regulate the exercise of the right to assembly; indication of the authority with jurisdiction over the matter, which authority shall receive advance notices for meetings held in public squares and thoroughfares, and notify of just causes used to restrict or forbid the holding of a meeting, the setting of limits to a meeting, et cetera, taking the Conclusions of this judgment in due consideration.”
In Conclusion #14 of the Constitutional Court’s judgment, the right of assembly is defined as “every person’s faculty to gather with others, in a specific place, temporarily and peacefully, without need of prior authorization, for the shared purposes of freely presenting and/or exchanging ideas or opinions, defending their own interests, or agreeing on joint actions.” After this judgment, Bill 2222/2007/CR, or “Bill of an Act to Regulate the Exercise of the Freedom of Assembly” was discussed during the legislative term from 2006-2011, but it was finally dropped in September 2011.
In light of the absence of a developed legal framework for assemblies, the below highlights some of the key existing barriers.
Under the Peruvian Constitution, the following general criteria apply to the exercise of the right of assembly for “political gatherings”:
1) The right of assembly shall be exercised peacefully and without arms;
2) No advance notice is required for meetings held in private buildings, or meetings open to the public; and
3) The right of assembly in public squares and thoroughfares does not require prior Authorization, but [only] that advance communication or notice be given to the authorities.
That said, the Ministry of Interior requires organizers of “Public Gatherings (meetings, marches, parades, processions, feasts and religious services)” to comply with advance notification requirements. This is regulated by Directive 04-2011-10-1501 (Provisions pertaining to the granting of guarantees for public gatherings, sporting and non-sporting public shows, and social events), which was approved by Directorial Resolution number 2492-2011-IN-1501 of April 12, 2011. The Directive was updated by the new Directive 0009-2015-ONAGI “Sobre Otorgamiento de Garantías Inherentes al Orden Público (“on Specific Aspects Granting Guarantees on Public Order”)”. This Directive states the following regarding notification requirements for “public gatherings”:
In both cases a “commitment document” must also be submitted (in a specific format) and signed by the legal representative of the petitioning organization stating that a commitment is undertaken that the public gathering referred to in the petition will: “take place without altering public order, interfering with or hindering normal transit, and without causing damages to property, either public or private; and liability is assumed that no arm, device, explosive or flammable material will be carried, and no blunt objects will be carried. [The signer] assumes criminal liability as appropriate.”
Should public authorities fail to respond specifically to the petition within a given period of time, then the petition must be deemed denied (negative administrative silence), and the petitioner may file an administrative remedy, as appropriate, either as a motion for reconsideration (before the same authority) or as an appeal (to a higher authority). The term for administrative remedies is fifteen (15) working days, and the term for a decision is thirty (30) working days.
Thus, according to this directive, “spontaneous assemblies” are considered to be an administrative issue requiring prior notice or communication to the authorities to ensure public order, security, or protection of property.”
Article 359 of the Electoral Organic Act (Act number 26859) states that, “The occurrence of more than one demonstration in a public place within one single city is hereby forbidden, except for places separated by more than one kilometer. Decisions in this regard will be made by the appropriate political authority, which will set an order of preference in keeping with the order notices were received.”
In Peru, the use of force by authorities is regulated by the following main regulations:
a) Legislative Decree No. 1095, which was modified by Law N° 31522 in July 2022, establishes rules for the use of force by the Armed Forces in the national territory (August 31, 2010), “limits for the use of force by the Armed Forces in compliance with their constitutional function, through the use of their potential and coercive capacity for the protection of society, in defense of the State of Right and in order to ensure peace and internal order in the national territory.”
b) Legislative Decree No. 1186, which regulates the use of force by the National Police of Peru (August 2015) in compliance with its constitutional purpose. According to this regulation, the use of force by the personnel of the National Police is based on respect for fundamental rights and the concurrence of the following principles: legality, necessity and proportionality.
The principle of proportionality, however, was revoked by Law of Political Protection (Ley de Protección Policial) N° 31012 of March 2020. According to Law N° 31012, the Penal Code was modified to exonerate from criminal responsibility the “personnel of the Armed Forces and the National Police of Peru, who in the fulfillment of their constitutional functions use their weapons or other means of defense to cause injury or death.” This law expressly revoked the section of article 4 of Legislative Decree N° 1186 that established that any use of force by the police to achieve a legitimate purpose of applying the law must be proportional to the threat it faces (proportionality principle).
According to the Report Freedom of the World (2018) for Peru by Freedom House: “Local disputes and protests are often related to extractive industries, land rights, and resource allocation among marginalized populations (…)”.
Two years later, Human Rights Watch stated, “In March 2020, Congress passed the so-called ‘Police Protection Law’ that could seriously increase the risk of abuse by this force. The law repeals the provision of Legislative Decree 1186 that requires that any use of force be proportional to the severity of the threat. It also limits the power of the judges to dictate the preventive detention of police officers accused of excessive use of force.”
In 2022, Human Rights Watch also noted that “Several decrees issued by Peruvian President Pedro Castillo that suspend fundamental rights in some areas of the country constitute disproportionate measures that encourage possible abuses.” For example, on April 7, 2022, President Castillo issued a 30-day State of Emergency decree that applies to the national road network and responds to the problem derived by a carrier strike. The State of Emergency enables the government to deploy the Armed Forces on these highways and suspend the constitutional rights of freedom of transit and peaceful assembly.”
Lastly, there were protests after the vacancy of former President Pedro Castillo in December 2022. The protesters demanded the resignation of the current President Dina Boluarte and a new Constitution, as well as early presidential and congressional elections. More generally, in December 2022, according to the “Social Conflict Report” of the Ombudsman’s Office, there were 221 social conflicts, including 160 active and 61 latent, as well as 704 collective protest actions. There were 38 deaths and 360 people injured.
|UN Universal Periodic Review Reports||UPR Peru
Compilation of UN information
Summary of stakeholders’ information
Report of the Working Group
Decision on the Outcome
Draft Report on the eighth session of the Human Rights Council
|https://mesadearticulacion.org/||This website refers to a group composed of 17 local associations and 5 regional networks of NGOs from Latin America that search for a common agenda about civil society organizations. The website contains important updates and reports about the legal framework, access to financing and other news about civil society organizations|
|Reports of UN Special Rapporteurs||Peru|
|USIG (United States International Grantmaking) Country Notes||USIG: Peru|
|U.S. State Department||
|Fragile States Index Reports||Foreign Policy: Failed States Index|
|IMF Country Reports||Peru and the IMF|
|APCI (Peruvian Agency of International Cooperation)||Catálogo de Oferta Peruana de Cooperación Técnica Internacional (2022)|
|Human Rights Watch||World Report: Peru (2023)
Deadly Decline Security Force Abuses and Democratic Crisis in Peru (2023)
|Ombudsman’s Report||(December 2022) “Social Conflict Report” of the Ombudsman’s Office|
|International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Online Library||Peru|
While we aim to maintain information that is as current as possible, we realize that situations can rapidly change. If you are aware of any additional information or inaccuracies on this page, please keep us informed; write to ICNL at email@example.com.
On April 11, 2021, elections were held in Peru to elect the president and vice-presidents of the Republic and congressmen for the government period 2021-2026. The candidates who went to the second electoral round were: Pedro Castillo (Perú Libre) and Keiko Fujimori (Fuerza Popular). The second round took place on June 6, 2021. Pedro Castillo was proclaimed the winner of the presidential elections more than a month after the elections.
U.S Democrats Pressure President Dina Boluarte over Human Rights Violations (July 2023)
While President Dina Boluarte was finalizing details of her speech for July 28, the date on which Peru’s independence is commemorated, a group of 15 U.S. Democratic congresspeople sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The purpose of the letter was to alert him to what is happening in Peru, a country plunged in social convulsion since Boluarte was sworn in as president last December after the failure of Pedro Castillo’s self-coup. The main concern expressed in the letter is “the lack of accountability for Peruvian security forces responsible for the disproportionate and lethal use of force against anti-government in recent months,” which, according to the lawmakers, “reflects the underlying corruption and impunity that has undermined Peru’s democracy and contributed to widespread political disillusionment.”
Peru Declares State of Emergency in Lima over Protests (December 2022)
Peru’s government has declared a state of emergency in the capital Lima and three other regions following protests which have killed at least 42 in recent weeks. The measure, which is in force for 30 days, authorizes the army to intervene to maintain order and suspends several constitutional rights, such as freedom of movement and assembly.
Peru Congress Approves Motion of Vacancy Against Pedro Castillo (December 2022)
Peru’s Congress approved the vacancy of President Pedro Castillo for “moral incapacity” after the president declared the dissolution of the parliament amid the political crisis that the country is going through. The Vice President, Dina Boluarte, will become the executive after being sworn in by the parliament. She will be the first woman to assume this position in the 200 years of the republic.
Indigenous Women Demand Repeal of Law 31494 (July 2022)
Indigenous women have raised their voices to demand the repeal of Law 31494. They state that they “will not allow a law that threatens our rights and subordinates us to the Armed and Police Forces to remain in force, without determining institutional responsibilities. The Indigenous women of Peru will resort to all legal avenues to assert our rights as Indigenous Peoples and women. Simply, we demand policies from the Legislative, Executive and Judicial Power that promote peace and non-violence.”
Peru’s Ruling Party Calls for President to Step Down in 2023 (April 2022)
Peruvian lawmakers from the ruling Peru Libre party presented a bill to cut President Pedro Castillo’s presidential term from five to two years, with general elections set for 2023. This an unprecedented setback from within his own ranks. Castillo, a leftist former school teacher and union leader, has presided over unprecedented political instability since taking office last July, cycling through four separate cabinets and surviving two impeachment attempts in just nine months in office.
Peru Takes Step Towards Elimination of Parliamentary Immunity (December 2020)
Peru’s Congress approved a constitutional reform that eliminates the judicial immunity of parliamentarians. This decision comes amid an institutional crisis in which four presidents have been appointed in the last four years.
Peru to Respect Regional Court’s Ruling on Fujimori (June 2018)
Peruvian President Martin Vizcarra said that his administration will abide by any ruling reached by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding the pardon granted to former head of state Alberto Fujimori. While Vizcarra declined to speculate on the possible contents of the ruling during a meeting with the foreign press in Lima, he did say that his government’s position is to “observe the Constitution, as well as local and international laws.” Fujimori, who was serving a 25-year prison sentence for crimes against humanity during his 1990-2000 presidency, walked out of jail last December after receiving a pardon from then-President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski.
Peru’s President Offers Resignation Over Vote-Buying Scandal (March 2018)
After less than two years in office, Peru’s embattled president, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, offered his resignation, a day after the release of videos that showed key allies trying to buy the support of opposition lawmakers. Mr. Kuczynski had spent months fighting off attempts to oust him, and he had vowed not to resign. But he faced an impeachment trial, which he appeared likely to lose, and the release of the videos made his decision inevitable.
Peru’s Teachers’ Strike May Have Ended, but Its Grievances Remain (September 2017)
Peru’s education system has been rocked by a nearly two-month-long teachers’ strike that came to a “temporary” end on September 2, but not before tarnishing the image of the government and threatening to force school children to repeat the academic year. While the teachers were able to agree on some terms with the government, many underlying issues remain unresolved.
Ombudsman Report for 2017 (February 2017)
There were a total of 212 social conflicts (144 socio-environmental conflicts), the majority of which were in the departments of Apurimac and Ancash.
Peru Declares State of Emergency After Mine Clashes (October 2015)
The Peruvian government declared a 30-day state of emergency in three provinces throughout the country following violent clashes between protesters and police, which left four people dead and fifteen people injured. Under the presidential decree, the armed forces will now support the national police in maintaining order in these provinces. The state of emergency also suspends the rights of freedom of movement and assembly. The violence began after protesters began demonstrating against the proposed expansion of the Las Bambas mining project located in Apurimac, which they claim will have a negative environmental impact.
First meeting for Las Bambas case (October 2015)
A roundtable will try the case of the mining project Las Bambas with its first meeting on 6 October in the municipality of Coyllurqui. According to the minutes of the meeting, the roundtable will be attended by the mayors of the districts, representatives of civil society and representatives of the executive. The population of Cotabambas province of the southern Andean region of Apurimac is in general strike against the mining project Las Bambas.
La Defensoría del Pueblo registró 212 conflictos sociales durante mayo (Spanish) (June 2014)
The Ombudsman presented the Social Conflict Report No. 123 for the month of May 2014, realizing that there were 212 social conflicts. 161 were registered as active and 51 dormant, which is keeping with the same trend as the prior month.
New Report on Social Conflicts in Peru (March 2014)
This document reports the following: (i) There were three (3) new social conflicts in February 2014; (ii) There are 166 active social conflicts and 46 latent social conflicts; (iii) The majority of social conflicts are located in the department of Ancash (24 cases), Apurimac (22 cases) and Puno (18 cases); followed by departments of Piura (13 cases) and Cajamarca (14 cases); (iv) The social conflicts are fundamentally social-environmental (64.2%, 136 cases);and (v) There have been registered 100 collective actions of protest.
Modern virtual Platform created by APCI-Agencia Peruana de Cooperación Internacional(December 2013)
In December 2013, APCI launched the modern virtual Platform, which provides important information about the international cooperation of Peru, such as the National Policy for Technical International Cooperation in Peru (2012), information about international sources of cooperation, and other projects of International Cooperation.
New Report of Social Conflicts in Peru (November 2013)
In November 2013 a report was published on Social Conflicts in Peru by the Ombudsman of Peru. This important document reports the following: (i) There has been five (5) new social conflicts in November 2013; (ii) There are active 174 social conflicts and latent 47 social conflicts, (iii) The major number of social conflicts are located in the department of Ancash( 30 cases), Apurimac (23 cases) and Puno (18 cases); followed by departments of Piura (13 cases), Cajamarca (13 cases) and Junin (13 cases); (iv) The social conflicts are fundamentally social environmental (64.7%, 143 cases); (v) There has been registered 85 collective actions of protest.
More Mine Protests Planned (February 2013)
Opponents of the stalled $5 billion Minas Conga copper and gold mine project in northern Peru plan to hold more protests in 2013, including a referendum in July. Violent clashes between police and protesters in 2012 led project lead operator Newmont Mining Corp (NEM) to put work leading to production on hold, while it builds water reservoirs. Protesters have said any project could hurt water supplies, something that Newmont disputes.
UN labour agency names five countries where ‘serious and urgent’ labour-rights cases need attention (November 2012)
A key rights committee of the United Nations labour agency identified five countries where it says worker-rights violations – some involving murder – represent the “most serious and urgent cases” among 32 countries examined at its meeting. Argentina, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Fiji and Peru were singled out by the Committee on Freedom of Association of the UN International Labour Organization (ILO) after Committee members reviewed cases involving rights to organize, negotiate through collective bargaining and engage in social dialogue.
Violent suppression of protest in Peru (October 2012)
One person has been killed and dozens more have been injured in a protest in Lima. The protest began over an attempt by the local government council to relocate market traders.
Spanish NGO sends humanitarian aid to Peru (August 2012)
The Spanish NGO Madre Coraje (Mother Courage) sent 20,000 kilos of aid to Peru through the coordination center, Caritas Peru. Caritas Peru supports the actions and programs of hundreds of institutions and religious congregations working in poor and inaccessible regions Peru where the most vulnerable populations live.
Urgent action to protect human rights of protesters (July 2012)
The International Network for Economic, Social & Cultural Rights (ESCR-Net) transmitted a communication to the Government of Peru requesting urgent action to protect the human rights of people protesting the Conga gold mine in Peru after five people lost their lives during the week of July 3 in a wave of “disproportionate police repression”.
HRW: Cajamarca response requires restraint, respect for Rule of Law (July 2012)
Three civilians died from gunshot wounds on July 3, 2012 in the city of Celendín during a confrontation between protesters and police and army units outside the city hall. More than 30 other civilians were injured, several of them reportedly with bullet wounds, according to local hospital officials. The government declared a state of emergency in three of Cajamarca department’s provinces. Those who died on July 3 – Faustino Silva Sánchez, José Eleuterio García Rojas, and César Medina Aguilar, a 17-year-old high school student – appear to have been shot after army units moved in to help the police. Another civilian, José Antonio Sánchez, who was gravely injured by a bullet wound in the throat, died in a hospital on July 5. There have been strikes and protests in the region against a large open-cast gold mine for several months.
Peru NGO workers detained near Newmont mine (March 2012)
Seven employees from a not-for-profit organization created by Newmont Mining’s Peruvian subsidiary have been detained by townspeople near the company’s stalled $4.8 billion Conga mine, the group said on Friday. A leader of the townspeople opposing the mine in northern Cajamarca, the most expensive ever attempted in Peru, said the workers were being investigated for trying to generate support for the giant gold and copper project but that all seven would be released soon.
Civil society helps Peru achieve EITI compliance (February 2012)
Peru has become the first Latin American country to achieve compliant status in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). A longtime EITI candidate, Peru received the approval of the EITI Board on 15 February, along with Mauritania. RWI local partner Cooperacción is the civil society representative on Peru’s EITI multi-stakeholder committee and has worked hard towards EITI validation. Julia Cuadros, director of Cooperacción, says improved information about oil and mining company payments to the Peruvian government helped Peru achieve compliance.
Government declares mining project null in Islay after two weeks of protests (April 2011)
About 2.000 workers marched in Lima against Emergency Decrees (February 2011)
Statement by AIDESEP on the rights and consultation of indigenous peoples (November 2010)
Peru: Amend Decrees for Prosecuting Military and Police Abuses (September 2010)
Police Repress Protest (August 2010)
Fujimori 25-year sentence upheld by Peru Supreme Court (January 2010)
Peru army and navy continue with war memorial plans (December 2009)
Peru: Investigate threats against rights defender (September 2009)