Ecuador default flag

Ecuador

Last updated: September 11, 2025

Recent Developments

On August 28, 2025, Ecuador enacted a new Organic Law on Social Transparency, which imposes additional registration requirements for registered CSOs and gives them 180 days to comply in order to continue carrying out activities. The law also establishes additional reporting requirements and sanctions for organizations and gives officials additional supervisory powers.

While we aim to maintain information that is as current as possible, we realize that situations can rapidly change. If you are aware of any additional information or inaccuracies on this page, please keep us informed; write to ICNL at ngomonitor@icnl.org.

Introduction

Civil society in Ecuador is diverse and active, encompassing foundations, corporations, professional and business associations, unions, and numerous informal organizations, such as church groups, sports clubs, and youth groups. Ecuador’s civil society operates within a civil law framework, which over the past 15 years has been shaped by frequent executive-level regulation, creating both formal and practical barriers to the formation, operation, and dissolution of CSOs. Although civic freedoms—including freedom of expression, association, and assembly—are constitutionally guaranteed, they are often constrained in practice by executive actions, legal ambiguity, and political pressures.

Civic Freedoms at a Glance

Organizational FormsCorporation, Foundations, National and Foreign Social Organizations, and Management or Social Organizations, which are founded by institutions or the state and may apply for inclusion within the registry system.
Registration BodyState Ministries through the RUOS (Unique Registry of Social Organizations) and SUIOS (Unified System of Social Organizations Information) website.
Approximate Number66,979 (according to the social organizations unique registry – www.sociedadcivil.gob.ec)
Barriers to FormationSecond and third degree Corporations and Foundations may not attain legal status without possessing USD 4,000; Registration applicants must submit the nationality, general data and identity cards of all its members.
Barriers to OperationsLimited political activity and and wide public discretion to control and dissolve CSOs.
Barriers to ResourcesRequired accreditation from RUOS (Unique Registry of Social Organizations) to access public resources.
Barriers to ExpressionCSOs and media outlets that are critical of the government may be subject to disproportionately burdensome financial penalties, unfair court proceedings, and may be dissolved by an administrative procedure.
Barriers to AssemblyWide discretion for protesters to be penalized for any political act based on the vaguely written Organic Integral Penal Code, which has 29 articles about crimes against the constitutional state structure, such as sabotage and paralyzation of public services.
ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS

Article 4 of Decree No. 193 establishes three types of CSOs: corporations, foundations, and other structures of national or foreign social organizations.

Article 9 further classifies corporations into three levels:

Third-degree corporations are entities composed of second-degree corporations, such as confederations, national unions, and similar umbrella organizations.

First-degree corporations are organizations formed by individuals pursuing a common goal, including associations, clubs, committees, professional associations, and centers;

Second-degree corporations bring together multiple first-degree corporations and include federations, chambers, and unions; and

PUBLIC BENEFIT STATUS

Under Ecuadorian tax law and its regulations, certain CSOs are exempt from paying income tax. Eligible organizations include those dedicated to public benefit; religious activities; women, children, and family development; culture and the arts; education and research;  health; sports; professional and labor unions; indigenous peoples; cooperatives; federations and confederations; and other peasants associations.

To receive this exemption, a CSO must meet the following requirements:

  1. At least 5 percent of annual income must come from donations or contributions;
  2. The organization must operate on a nonprofit basis;
  3. All income must be directed to the organization’s stated objectives; and
  4. Any excess income must be re-invested into the organization.

There is no preferential tax treatment for income from foreign sources.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Since 2008, Ecuador has recognized five branches of government: the executive, legislative, judicial, electoral, and transparency and social control. The transparency and social control branch oversees public-sector entities and organizations, as well as private-sector bodies that provide services or carry out activities in the public interest. Its mandate is to ensure that such activities are conducted responsibly, transparently, and equitably. In addition, it promotes citizen participation, protects the exercise and fulfillment of rights, and combats corruption.

This branch is composed of the Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control, the Ombudsman’s Office, the State Comptroller General’s Office, and the superintendencies. These bodies enjoy legal personality and administrative, financial, budgetary, and organizational autonomy under the law. According to the Ecuadorean Constitution, the Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control is tasked with promoting the exercise of participatory rights, organizing mechanisms of social oversight on matters of public interest, and appointing certain public authorities in accordance with the law. Despite its broad mandate, the Council has struggled to function effectively.

The Council consists of seven members and seven alternates. From among its members, the counselors elect a president, who serves as the Council’s legal representative. Counselors must be Ecuadorian citizens with experience in social organizations, citizen participation, or anti-corruption efforts, or have a professional background that demonstrates civic commitment and defense of the public interest. They may not have been members, adherents, or leaders of political parties or political movements in the five years prior to their appointment.

BARRIERS TO FORMATION

The 2010 Organic Law on Citizen Participation is interpreted to require all CSOs to obtain legal status before operating.

Successive decrees have created significant barriers for CSOs seeking legal status in Ecuador. Decree No. 982 of 2008, for example, required organizations to demonstrate minimum assets—USD 400 for first-degree organizations and USD 4,000 for second- and third-degree organizations—before they could register. It also mandated that all members be individually listed in a publicly accessible online registry.

Decree No. 16, which replaced Decree No. 982 in 2013, added further restrictions. Key provisions included:

  1. Proof of minimum assets in kind or cash: USD 400 for first-degree corporations, and USD 4,000 for second- and third-degree corporations and foundations (with an exception for organizations dedicated to the “defense of rights”); 
  2. Submission of bylaws conforming to conditions established by the decree; and
  3. Submission of the nationality, personal data, and identity cards of all members to the registry.

Although Decree No. 193, enacted in 2017, replaced Decree No. 16 (as well as Decree No. 739 of 2015), it largely preserved the burdensome requirements for obtaining legal personality.

Additional restrictions have emerged through ministerial regulations. Ministerial Agreement No. 12 of October 25, 2016, stipulated that CSOs working in fields that fall under the Ministry of Economic and Social Inclusion would only be approved if their objectives aligned with official priorities: the defense of vulnerable groups, promotion of social development and mobility, or strengthening the economy. These objectives are based on the Ministry’s Statute of Organizational Management by Processes.

Dissolution

Article 19 of Decree No. 193 preserved two broad grounds for dissolving social organizations: “deviating from the purposes and objectives for which it was constituted” and “engaging in partisan politics activities,” which are legally reserved for registered political parties and movements.

These provisions grant authorities wide discretion to dissolve CSOs. In a notable example, in December 2013 the Ministry of Environment dissolved Foundation Pachamama, alleging that it had failed to fulfill its objectives and was “acting like a political party that affected the internal security of the state as well as public peace.” An appeal was denied in February 2014, with the Ministry ruling that no constitutional rights had been violated. The Foundation’s legal personality was reinstated in November 2017 by a ministerial resolution.

Another prominent case occurred in July 2016, when the Ministry of Education initiated legal proceedings to dissolve the National Education Union (UNE), one of Ecuador’s oldest and largest trade unions. The proceedings, widely considered unconstitutional, prompted UNE to seek direct intervention from the International Labour Organization (ILO). That same month, the Ministry also notified nine other CSOs of alleged violations related to the election of officers and compliance with organizational statutes.

BARRIERS TO OPERATIONS

Under Decree No. 193, foundations and corporations are subject to operational controls related to the use of public resources, taxation, customs, and fulfillment of organizational purposes. Although Decree No. 193 repealed several obligations contained in Decree No. 739, it retained a number of restrictive provisions, including:

  • The ministry that granted a CSO’s legal identity may verify its documents and monitor fulfillment of its stated objectives;
  • The state may control the transfer of public funds to CSOs;
  • CSOs remain subject to taxation; and
  • The state may exercise any oversight powers provided under law.

Barriers to International Contact

The National Service of Ecuadorian Customs retains authority to monitor and control foreign transactions involving CSOs, which can hinder access to international funding and collaboration.

BARRIERS TO RESOURCES

Ecuadorian law does not impose formal legal barriers on CSOs’ ability to seek or secure resources. However, corporations and foundations may be required to submit economic reports to the government upon request, giving authorities discretionary oversight of CSOs’ financial management.

BARRIERS TO EXPRESSION

During his presidency (2007-2017), Rafael Correa frequently accused CSOs of acting as political instruments against his government. His rhetoric fostered a hostile environment for civil society and likely discouraged CSO advocacy efforts. Correa also took a hard line against independent media, targeting outlets that criticized his policies. In 2011, for example, he sued a media outlet over its coverage of his response to a protest and used his legal team to pressure judges to rule in his favor.

Hostility toward the press has continued in more recent years. In August 2023, amid growing political instability before the general elections, journalists faced increasing verbal attacks from political figures. Luisa Gonzalez, a Correa-backed presidential candidate who led in early polls but ultimately lost the election, publicly disparaged critical reporters as “pseudo-journalists,” “information traffickers,” and “hit men” paid to destroy reputations.

BARRIERS TO ASSEMBLY

The Ecuadorian Constitution guarantees the right to assembly and association through several provisions:

  • Article 66.13: The State recognizes and guarantees the right of people to associate, meet, and demonstrate or protest freely and voluntarily.
  • Article 98: Individuals and groups may exercise the right of resistance against acts or omissions of public authorities, as well as against natural or legal persons that violate or may infringe their constitutional rights, and may claim or demand the recognition of new rights

There is no standalone law specifically regulating assembly or public gatherings; however, other laws affect this right:

  • The Organic Code of Territorial Organization, Autonomy, and Decentralization grants municipal governments responsibility for the use of public spaces. Thus, organizers of public gatherings, demonstrations, or marches in public spaces must ask for municipal permission.
  • The Penal Code requires police to guarantee civil and religious assemblies and authorizes them to prevent or dissolve gatherings that disturb the peace or commit an offense, applying measures deemed appropriate in each case.

Several key barriers affect the freedom of assembly:

Advance Permission
Organizers of assemblies, protests, or public gatherings in public places must secure permission from both the municipality and the Police Superintendent within the Ministry of Interior. Regulations do not specify how far in advance notice must be submitted, what information must be provided, or when authorities must respond. However, authorities are generally required to respond to petitions within 15 business days, with a presumption of approval if no response is given.

Because advance notice is required, spontaneous demonstrations are effectively prohibited. Under Article 153 of the Penal Code, anyone who promotes, directs, or organizes a public demonstration without written permission may face imprisonment of one to three months and fines of USD 9 to 26.

Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
Under ordinary circumstances, assemblies may be held at any time or place. However, according to the Constitution, the President may declare a state of emergency in the entire country or certain areas during “severe external or internal conflicts,” which can impose restrictions on gatherings.

Criminal Penalties

Articles 345 and 346 of the Penal Code classify acts that sabotage or paralyze public services as “crimes against the constitutional state structure,” which can apply to certain forms of protest.

Additional Resources

GLOBAL INDEX RANKINGS
Ranking BodyRankRanking Scale
(best – worst possible)
UN Human Development Index88 (2023)1 – 193
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index97 (2024)1 – 142
Transparency International121 (2024)1 – 180
Fund for Peace Fragile States Index90 (2024)179 – 1
Freedom House: Freedom in the WorldStatus: Partly Free
Political Rights: 28
Civil Liberties: 37 (2025)
Free/Partly Free/Not Free
40 – 0
60 – 0
REPORTS
UN Universal Periodic Review ReportsEcuador UPR page
Reports of UN Special RapporteursEcuador
UN Human Rights CommitteeConcluding observations on the combined twenty-third and twenty-fourth periodic reports of Ecuador (2017)
U.S. State Department2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
Fund for Peace Fragile States Index ReportsEcuador
IMF Country ReportsEcuador and the IMF
Comité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos HumanosComité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos) named: “Situation of Human Rights in Guayaquil. 2014 Report
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Online LibraryEcuador
NEWS

The right to defend rights at risk under President Daniel Noboa’s government (August 2025)
Front Line Defenders expresses its deep concern about the deterioration of conditions for the defence of human rights and nature in Ecuador, and its impact on defenders in this context. This is attributable to a series of institutional measures and new legislation proposed by the national government that open the door to the closure of fundamental rights spaces, the criminalisation of human rights defenders and civil society organisations, and impact access to justice and information.

Ecuador NGO report identifies 45 human rights violations by public officials under executive decree 111 (July 2024)
The Regional Human Rights Advisory Foundation (Inredh) of Ecuador presented its report on human rights violations under Executive Decree 111, in which it recorded 45 cases of violations perpetrated by public officials. The NGO’s 28-page report documents and analyses complaints made by citizens from January 8 to April 8 of this year, which were collected through various social media platforms.

Business heir Daniel Noboa sworn in as Ecuador president (February 2024)
Daniel Noboa has been sworn in as Ecuador’s new president, promising to reduce violence and create jobs in the country gripped by a bloody drug war. The 35-year-old heir to a banana business empire won a run-off vote in October on promises to restore security and boost employment in the South American country, which has faced economic challenges since the coronavirus pandemic, pushing thousands to migrate.

Authorities must safeguard human rights amidst pre-electoral violence (August 2023)
Amnesty International is extremely concerned at the current state of violence in Ecuador, which is facing a sharp increase in its homicide rate as well as a series of killings of candidates for public office in recent weeks, culminating with the seemingly politically motivated killing of Fernando Villavicencio last night. The victims of the current spate of political violence deserve truth, justice and reparation and authorities must take swift action to investigate these crimes. At the same time, the state of emergency declared in response to these events must not open the door to grave human rights violations that could undermine the security of Ecuador’s population as a whole.

Ecuadorian Women March against Gender Violence (October 2022)
Ecuadorian women took to the streets to protest against the 206 femicides already recorded in the country during 2022 in the aftermath of María Belén Bernal’s murder. The 34-year-old lawyer went to visit her partner at the Police Academy in Quito and was not heard from for days until her body was found in a nearby bush. The man, a police lieutenant, is still at large. After sacking two police generals as well as Interior Minister Patricio Carrillo, President Guillermo Lasso announced the creation of a gender-violence unit in each state agency and pledged to increase the budget for the enforcement of the Law for the Eradication of Violence against Women.

ARCHIVED NEWS

Representatives of Civil Society Propose Dialogue between Government and Protesters (June 2022)

New Initiative to Strengthen Civil Society (April 2022) (Spanish)

Launch of the Coalition for Freedom of Association (April 2021) (Spanish)

IACHR Announces Observation Mission to Ecuador in Response to Protests (October 2019)

Massive Mobilisation of International Civil Society on Global Anti-Chevron Day (May 2019)

Dialogue with Civil Society: Halfway There (May 2018) (Spanish)

Campaign for Popular Consultation and Referendum Ends in Ecuador (February 2018)

Ecuador adopts a new approach towards foreign investment (January 2018)

Pachamama NGO will return to work (November 2017) (Spanish)

The repeal of decree 16-739 does not improve the situation of civil society (November 2017) (Spanish)

President Moreno has revoked two executive decrees (October 2017) (Spanish)

Civil society is organizing to demand a popular consultation (September 2017) (Spanish)

Code of Participation “Stabs” Civil Society (August 2017) (Spanish)

Decrees 16 and 739: Simple mechanisms to dissolve organizations? (May 2017) (Spanish)

Freedom of association in check (May 2017) (Spanish)

Draft Organic Code of Citizen Participation and Social Control (April 2017) (Spanish)

State of civil society (April 2017) (Spanish)

“We don´t want Ecuador to end up like Venezuela” (March 2017) (Spanish)

Ecuador: Universal Periodic Review, October 2016 (October 2016)

How to register social organizations (August 2016) (Spanish)

The Two Readings of the UN Human Rights Report (August 2016) (Spanish)

Nine Organizations Face Dissolution (July 2016) (Spanish)

National Union of Educators (UNE) Faces Dissolution (July 2016) (Spanish)

Citizen group takes stock of the citizen participation ordinance (February 2016)

Condemning Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Attacks on Fundamedios (January 2016)

Constitutional Amendments Approved in Ecuador (December 2015) (Spanish)

Dissolution of Fundamedios Threatens All CSOs (September 2015) (Spanish)

CSOs Call for Repeal of Decree (September 2015) (Spanish)

Fundamedios Threatened with Dissolution (June 2015) (Spanish)

CSOs brief CEDAW on Situation of Women in Ecuador (March 2015)

Decree No. 16 keeps social organizations on the edge (February 2015) (Spanish)

Government enacts rule to have organized implementation of Decree No. 16 (February 2015) (Spanish)

Facebook Pages of Government Critics Censored (September 2014) (Spanish)

Deadline to Complete the New Registry System (July 2014) (Spanish)

At odds with Ecuador, USAID moves to leave (July 2014)

Activistas son detenidos en distintos actos represivos (July 2014) (Spanish)

Participación Ciudadana (PC) that monitors elections is under Supervision of the Secretariat of Communications (SECOM) (March 2014) (Spanish)

Ministerio del Ambiente rechaza recurso de apelación interpuesto por Fundación Pachamama (Febrero 2014)

Ecuador Uses Presidential Decree Powers to Shut Down NGO (December 2013)

El Gobierno cierra la ONG Pachamama por protestas (Diciembre 2013)

Human Rights Watch calls on Correa to revoke Decree No. 16 (August 2013)

Defenders of Pachamama Protest Breach of the Mining Mandate (May 2013)

Ecuador the latest ‘XXIst Century Dictatorship’? (February 2013)

NGO petition yields results for Amazon (January 2013)

Ecuador’s president proposes freedom of expression as a function of the State (November 2012)

UNHCR chief highlights role of CSOs on World Refugee Day (June 2012)

Ecuador’s indigenous peoples reach Quito after 600km March for Water, Life and Dignity (March 2012)

Ecuadorean Court of National Justice accepts President Correa’s pardons in libel cases involving the media (February 2012)

Civil society organizations respond to government regulations in Ecuador (June 2011)

According to Human Rights Watch the legal actions taken by President Correa represent a step backwards on freedom of expression (March 2011)

NGOs to publish manifesto on proposed draft regulations (January 2011)

Human Rights Watch calls for Ecuador to withdraw proposed Presidential Decree on civil society (December 2010)

Ecuador: Modify proposed Communications Law (August 2010)

Ecuador agrees to keep Amazon Eco-Treasure free of oil drilling (August 2010)

Civil society organisations in Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador and Uruguay aim to strengthen their accountability practices (May 2010)

Ecuador holds big drive to register Colombian refugees (March 2010)

Key Events

On July 31, 2022, more than 50 representatives of social organizations from Ecuador inaugurated the Training School for Leaders.

historical notes

Civil society in Ecuador originated in the early 20th century with charitable and voluntary organizations that provided services to the poor and vulnerable. By the 1950s, these organizations had evolved into CSOs offering support to people with disabilities, family planning services, and educational programs. During the 1960s and 1970s, CSOs expanded their focus to urban development, environmental protection, and women’s issues. The simultaneous growth of public services—education, health, water, and irrigation—led to the creation of parents’, teachers’, and students’ associations, as well as housing, water, irrigation, and neighborhood associations.

In the 1980s and 1990s, new CSOs emerged dedicated to protecting civil, political, cultural, and indigenous rights, promoting gender equity, and advancing environmental causes. During this period, civil society actors actively engaged with government, playing a key role in drafting the 1998 and 2008 Constitutions.

Today, Ecuador has a diverse and active civil society comprising corporations, foundations, private and public sector unions, professional and business organizations, and numerous informal organizations, including church groups, sports clubs, and youth groups. Despite high levels of CSO membership, overall civic engagement and citizen participation remain low. Membership in professional associations and chambers of commerce has declined since the Constitutional Court declared mandatory affiliation unconstitutional in 2008.

Regulatory Environment

CSOs have faced increasingly restrictive regulatory measures since 2013. Executive Decree No. 16 of 2013 established the National Secretary of Politics Management, tasked with regulating social and civic organizations. The Secretary and other government agencies reportedly hacked CSOs’ email accounts without court orders; blocked online content published by activists; imposed excessive fines on CSOs; and seized CSOs’ assets. The decree was also used to justify involuntary termination on vague grounds. Executive Decree No, 739 of 2015 required CSOs to report on their funding and activities to the executive branch of the government.

In October 2017, Decree No, 193 replaced Executive Decrees No, 16 and 739. While it simplified requirements for granting legal personality, it continued the government practice of regulating social organizations via executive decree rather than through legislation, as mandated by the Constitution, and failed to define procedures for dissolution.

Recent Political Context

Following Guillermo Lasso’s inauguration as president on May 24, 2021, he expressed full support for CSOs and promised an atmosphere of total operational freedom. In June 2021, Ministerial Decision No. MIES-2021-036 took effect, establishing “General Rules for the Attention of Procedures of Social Organizations and the Application of the Regulation for the Granting of Legal Personality to Social Organizations” issued under Decree No. 193. The Decision applies to all social organizations registered with, or seeking registration through, the Ministry of Economic and Social Inclusion, and covers:

  • Approval of statutes and granting of legal personality;
  • Reform and codification of statutes;
  • Internal democratic governance (board registers and inclusion/exclusion of members);
  • Dissolution and liquidation;
  • Reactivation;
  • Operational control;
  • Certification of legal existence; and
  • Updates of documents.

The Ministerial Decision is generally viewed as a positive development because it allows government bodies to regulate CSOs more effectively. Nevertheless, Ecuador continues to regulate the right of association through mechanisms that largely bypass the Civil Code and constitutional principles. For instance, the 2010 Organic Law on Citizen Participation is still narrowly interpreted to require all CSOs to obtain legal status before operating.

In October 2023, Daniel Noboa, heir to a business empire, was elected president amid rising crime and drug trafficking. In January 2024, Noboa “declared war” on gangs, drawing comparisons to El Salvador’s president Nayib Bukele. Noboa has stated, however, that he will not seek “to change the constitution to stay longer in power or to declare myself a dictator.”