Honduras default flag

Honduras

Last updated: November 5, 2024

Recent Developments

While we aim to maintain information that is as current as possible, we realize that situations can rapidly change. If you are aware of any additional information or inaccuracies on this page, please keep us informed; write to ICNL at ngomonitor@icnl.org.

Introduction

Honduras is a republican state with a written legal tradition and power divided between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Its current Constitution dates to 1982. Civil society in Honduras has its roots in church groups and grassroots organizations (labor and peasant-based) that were established in the 1950s and began to flourish in the 1980s and 1990s when the concept of civil society in Honduras became part of national legislation. After Hurricane Mitch in 1998, civil society organizations (CSOs) grew in number, increased their activities, and began to coordinate their efforts because international funding was plentiful and the need was great.

Since the 1990s, civil society has made progress, despite a tradition of public indifference and the refusal of some in government to allow civil society to contribute to public policy discussions. CSOs have managed to increase the space for civic engagement with government at both the executive and legislative levels. After Hurricane Mitch in 1998, CSOs grew in number, increased their activities, and began to coordinate their efforts because international funding was plentiful and the need was great. Today there are many laws that provide for civil society participation in governmental functions, either as consultants, implementers, or social service providers.

In 2009, Honduras experienced a political crisis that arose from a dispute over plans to amend the Constitution, which culminated in the forcible removal and exile of President Manuel Zelaya by the military. In November 2009, presidential elections were held, and Porfirio Lobo was sworn in on January 27, 2010. Honduras has remained deeply divided following the 2009-2010 political crisis and sharp divisions continued under Juan Orlando Hernández, who was sworn in as president in January 2014. Hernández was re-elected in 2017 despite there being no Constitutional amendment to allow for his re-election. The ruling that allowed for his re-election was issued by the Constitutional Court of the Supreme Court of Justice. Various political and civil society actors never recognized the legitimacy of his re-election.

In 2011, Honduras also approved the Special Law for Non-Governmental Development Organizations (NGO-Ds) by Legislative Decree No. 32-2011 of June 27, 2011. This law was discussed with leading national NGO-D networks, especially with the Federation of Private Organizations of Honduras (FOPRIDEH). This law conforms closely to international standards of freedom of association and the exercise of rights by civic organizations. On June 4, 2013, Executive Accord 65-2013 was published in the official journal “La Gaceta” and contains the Regulations of the NGO-D Law.

The administration headed by Juan Orlando Hernández made several management changes to the Unit for Registering and Monitoring Civil Associations (URSAC), purportedly in an effort to modernize it. In addition, in 2018 the “ventanilla única (unique window)” was opened, which is an office specialized in the registration of civic associations that support vulnerable groups. (Since 2019, URSAC has been renamed Dirección de Registro y Seguimiento a las Asociaciones Civiles (DIRSAC)).

The Tax Administration Service has also introduced measures that treat CSOs as for-profit companies, resulting in the closure of many CSOs due to high administrative costs. In addition, corruption scandals have arisen involving public officials using public funds to create CSOs for illegal purposes. This has necessitated a review of the legal framework and control systems for the creation and operation of Honduran CSOs.

On November 28, 2021, Xiomara Castro de Zelaya, the wife of former President Manuel Zelaya of the Left Party Libertad y Refundación (LIBRE), was elected president. Roughly 70% of all voters went to the polls. This new era of political participation demonstrated that the Honduran people rejected political corruption, mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the nexus between drug trafficking and politics.

In the next four years, the administration will likely prioritize combatting corruption and drug trafficking and promoting social investment, given the high levels of poverty that affect 70% of the population. Other areas that may be prioritized will be education and health and responses to natural disasters, several of which have occurred in recent years.

Civic Freedoms at a Glance

Organizational FormsFoundations and Associations
Registration BodyDirección de Regulación, Registro y Seguimiento de Asociaciones Civiles (DIRSAC). Secretaría de Gobernación, Justicia y Descentralización.
Approximate Number9,865
Barriers to FormationNone.
Barriers to OperationsThe current legal framework gives the government significant power and discretion to supervise the activities of organizations. In addition, the taxes paid by CSOs are the same as those paid by for-profit companies.
Barriers to ResourcesSustainability is a serious problem for many organizations due to lack of resources.
Barriers to ExpressionNone.
Barriers to AssemblyExcessive restrictions on places where assemblies can be held and excessive penalties for violations of assembly regulations.
ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS

Honduran laws make reference to various forms of organizations:  Private Development Organizations (OPDs in Spanish), Non-Profit Organizations (OSFLs in Spanish), Nongovernmental Organizations (ONGs and ONGDs – development ONGs), Civil Associations, and most recently, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). [For purposes of this report, the term “civil society organization” or “CSO” is intended to refer to all previously listed forms and not more narrowly to the organizational form defined as a CSO.]

However, the Civil Code (Articles 56 and 58) only recognizes as legal persons two forms of organizations, that is, associations and foundations. For registration purposes, the government includes within the concept of civil association “any form of association, institution, organization or foundation whose grant or cancellation of legal personality belongs to the President of the Republic itself or through the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Interior and Justice.” (Regulations of the Registry and Tracking Unit of Civil Associations Art. 6; Ministerial Decree No. PCM-024-2002. Government Gazette, 5/9/2003)

In order to gain simple legal status, an organization must present an application, power of attorney, articles of incorporation, bylaws, copies of the board members’ identity cards, and a 10-lempira stamp to the authorities. In most cases, the application is made to the Ministry of Interior and Justice.

PUBLIC BENEFIT STATUS

Honduran laws do not make a clear distinction between mutual benefit organizations and public benefit organizations.

Indeed, the tax framework did not clearly distinguish between CSOs and businesses. According to the national taxation framework regulations, CSOs had to pay tax on all their activities and services as if they were businesses. The legal framework consisted of the Act Strengthening Income, Social Equity and Rationalization of Public Expenditure (Decree 17-2010) and Tax Equity Law (Decree 51-2003).

In July 2016, however, representatives of the CSO and business sectors and the government reached an agreement regarding the new Tax Code, which will enter into force in January 2017. The New Tax Code establishes a “monotributario”, or single tax, that provides equal tax treatment for CSOs and churches. This means that the government has recognized that CSOs and churches both have not-for-profit purposes. Under the previous Tax Code, in contrast, CSOs were treated as if they were companies for tax purposes. The Federation of Private Organizations of Honduras (FOPRIDEH) had engaged in dialogue with the government on the national taxation framework in order to encourage the government to recognize that CSOs do not pursue commercial purposes and therefore should be treated distinctly in the tax framework. FOPRIDEH’s efforts appear to have succeeded.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The Constitution, in Article 5, envisions mechanisms of citizen consultation in the form of referenda and plebiscite. (For more information, please see “Constitutional Framework” section above.)  Decree 135-2009 regulates plebiscites and referenda in more detail. Significantly, after 2011, the force of law was given to all matters submitted to referenda and plebiscites.

In addition, other national legislation and regulatory measures provide spaces for citizen consultation. Among others, examples include:

  • The Law of the National Convergence Forum;
  • Presidential Decree on the Civil Society Participation Commission;
  • The Law of Municipalities and its Regulations;
  • The Organic Law of the Human Rights Commission, and its Regulations;
  • National Anti-Corruption Council Law; and
  • Special Promotion Law for Non-Governmental Development Organizations (NGDOs).

(For more information, please see “National Laws and Regulations Affecting Sector”)

In practice, however, mechanisms for participation are rarely used. As a result, laws are passed without citizen consultation, including on environmental issues, while acts of corruption and other abuses of power occur without sufficient citizen oversight. On the one hand, political parties have no interest in using these mechanisms. On the other hand, CSOs have not pushed for the systematic use of these mechanisms.

In this context, however, the Special Promotion Law for NGDOs is the most widely used of all mechanisms, and some municipalities also use open councils to make decisions of local interest. Notably, the Municipalities Law establishes a mechanism called the “cabildo abierto” through which the mayor consults citizens on issues of local interest.

BARRIERS TO FORMATION

Honduran CSOs have historically operated without the benefit of a “framework” law that provides the basic conditions for establishing a CSO as a legal person and regulating its operations. The NGO-D Law and its Regulation, however, now provide legal certainty to NGO-Ds by establishing a closed list of requirements for obtaining and maintaining legal personality. Therefore, current government authorities in charge of granting legal personality to CSOs cannot exercise unfettered authority in the same ways as in the past.

In late 2015, a national debate arose among CSOs about the large-scale registration of evangelical churches in the Unit for Registering and Monitoring Civil Associations (URSAC). Various CSO networks requested that the government allow evangelical churches to come to register an umbrella body as the “Evangelical Fellowship of Honduras.” The Government of Honduras, however, refused to register the organization, because the NGO-D Law expressly prohibits the registration of churches (Article 2).

More recently, the administration of President Hernández made several management changes to URSAC, purportedly in an effort to modernize it. In 2018, URSAC opened the “ventanilla única (unique window)”, which is an office specialized in the registration of civil associations that provide support programs for vulnerable groups. It did not replace URSAC, but complemented it in the hope that it could help URSAC strengthen its mandate to register and monitor CSOs. Since 2019, URSAC has been renamed Dirección de Registro y Seguimiento a las Asociaciones Civiles (DIRSAC).

BARRIERS TO OPERATIONS

Honduran CSOs have historically operated without the benefit of a “framework” law that provides the basic conditions for establishing a CSO with legal personality and for regulating CSO operations. The NGO-D Law and its Regulations, however, provide legal certainty to NGO-Ds by establishing a specific list of requirements for obtaining and maintaining legal personality. Therefore, current government authorities in charge of granting legal personality to CSOs cannot exercise unfettered authority in the same ways as in the past.

More recently, the administration of President Juan Orlando Hernández made several management changes to URSAC, purportedly in an effort to modernize it. In 2018, URSAC opened the “ventanilla única (unique window)”, which is an office specialized in the registration of civil associations that provide support programs for vulnerable groups. It did not replace URSAC, but complemented it in the hope that it could help URSAC strengthen its mandate to register and monitor CSOs. Since 2019, URSAC has been renamed Dirección de Regulación, Registro y Seguimiento de Asociaciones Civiles (DIRSAC).

Law 288-2021 was approved on July 31, 2021. The new law requires that all CSOs regulate their internal governance, including the term limits of each position, the method of election of leaders, the election of the board of directors and other governing bodies, and the way statutes are revised, among other matters. The law has proved controversial as it was enacted without the benefit of any consultations with civil society.

BARRIERS TO RESOURCES

Sustainability is a major issue for Honduran CSOs. Their survival depends to a large extent on foreign funding that is steadily decreasing; the scarcity of available funds is a problem for the entire sector. As a result, CSOs have been forced to seek other avenues of support. Although there have not been significant legal barriers to resources, humanitarian assistance organizations have had serious problems introducing aid to those affected by the COVID-9 pandemic and natural disasters. Instead of cooperating with CSOs, the government collects taxes and restricts donations received from abroad under authority of the Ministry of Finance and Administration and Income Services (SAR). This has been denounced nationally and internationally by the Federation of Private Organizations of Honduras (FOPRIDEH) and several international organizations operating in Honduras.

BARRIERS TO EXPRESSION

There are currently no significant restrictions on the right to speech and advocacy. However, the practice of using “ghost” organizations or foundations has greatly affected the credibility of the sector. Such “ghost” organizations have been in the registry database for many years, but do not appear to currently have any activities or headquarters and around 300 of them have come under suspicion from the Public Ministry for having ties to organized crime.

In addition, civil society analysts have expressed concern with Decree No. PCM 023-2022, which became law in January 2022 and created the General Directorate of Information and Press. It is considered an attempt to further control the media at the national level.

BARRIERS TO ASSEMBLY

The Constitution of Honduras (Decree 131, January 11, 1982) guarantees the right to freedom of assembly in two articles:

Article 78: The freedoms of association and assembly are guaranteed provided they are not contrary to public order and morality.

Article 79: Everyone has the right to meet with others peacefully and unarmed, in a public meeting or an informal gathering, in connection with their common interest of any nature, without notice or special permission.

Outdoor gatherings that are political in nature may be subject to a special permit system for the sole purpose of ensuring public order.

Article 15 also states that “the State of Honduras endorses the principles and practices of international law,” and Article 16 states that “once international agreements are approved they are part of the domestic law.” Moreover, Article 18 of the Constitution provides that “in Honduras if conflict arises between the law and a treaty, the treaty prevails.” Thus, Honduran law guarantees freedom of assembly in as broad terms as Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

There is no specific legislation regulating the right of assembly itself, but there are relevant provisions in the following Acts:

  • Law on Police and Social Affairs;
  • Municipalities Act;
  • Traffic Act; and
  • Electoral and Political Organizations Act.

Legal barriers to the freedom of assembly include the following:

Advance Notification

A notification before holding an assembly in a public place is required 72 hours in advance. The notification must be submitted to local governments to enable authorities to prepare for traffic and the use of the public space. The notification must include the name of the institution or group of persons calling the meeting, the organizers that support implementation of the meeting, and a declaration to comply with the law regarding the use of no weapons, no rioting or disrupting the free movement of citizens. The organizer must reveal the names of the participants in the assembly. Despite the advance notification requirements, spontaneous assemblies are allowed based on Article 79 of the Constitution.

Time, Place and Manner Restrictions

Article 150 of the Electoral Act states that political meetings: “4) cannot be within two hundred (200) meters of bridges, intersections of roads, places of worship, fire stations, Red Cross, hospitals, police departments and schools. Those who contravene the provisions of the first paragraph of this article shall be punished by a fine of four (4) to ten (10) times the minimum wage.”

There are also restrictions on the use of loud speakers near hospitals, schools and churches.

Grounds for Dispersal

According to Article 51 of the Law on Police and Social Affairs:

The police may disperse protest groups in roads, bridges, buildings and facilities affecting public services where they prevent the free movement or access or to counteract public order, morality and decency and damage public and private property.

Article 52 goes on to state:

In the event that the public peace is jeopardized or public safety with weapons or other means of violent action, or free transit is hindered, the police may dissolve the assembly or demonstration and remove obstacles.

Article 60 underscores that the exercise of assembly and public demonstration “should be prohibited when it will affect the free movement and rights of others.”

Excessive Penalties

The Penal Code, Article 331 states that “convening any unlawful assembly or demonstration” is “punishable by imprisonment of two (2) to four (4) years and a fine of thirty-thousand to sixty thousand lempiras (approx. $1500 to $3000).

COVID-19’s Impact

Since March 21, 2020, Honduras has been in a state of humanitarian emergency under Decree 23-2020, which was issued by the President. This Decree limits freedom of assembly and movement at the national level. It also regulates all commercial activities, entrance into and departure from the country, and police, health, and military affairs. Throughout 2021, Honduras has maintained meeting bans when there are more than 12 people.

Additional Resources

GLOBAL INDEX RANKINGS
Ranking BodyRankRanking Scale
(best – worst possible)
UN Human Development Index138 (2023)1 – 193
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index119 (2023)1 – 142
Transparency International157 (2023)1 – 180
Freedom House: Freedom in the WorldStatus: Partly Free
Political Rights: 22
Civil Liberties: 26 (2024)
Free/Partly Free/Not Free
40 – 1
60 – 1
Foreign Policy: Fragile States Index56 (2023)179 – 1
REPORTS
UN Universal Periodic Review ReportsHonduras UPR page
Reports of UN Special RapporteursHonduras
U.S. State Department2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (Honduras)
Failed States Index ReportsForeign Policy: Fragile States Index
IMF Country ReportsHonduras and the IMF
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Online LibraryHonduras
NEWS

Environmental Defenders Still under Siege (October 2024)
Juan López was gunned down on September 14. An environmental activist, community leader and member of the Municipal Committee in Defence of the Commons and Public Goods of Tocoa, he was the latest victim of extractive greed in Honduras. Communities protecting the rivers that flow through the Bajo Aguán region have seen several of their leaders assassinated.

Transparency International Condemns Statements by Authorities in Honduras (February 2024)
Transparency International condemns recent statements by authorities in Honduras directed at us and our chapter, the Association for a More Just Society (ASJ), following the publication of the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). Instead of responding by redoubling efforts to address the root causes of corruption in the country, the government has resorted to defaming our national chapter and the CPI methodology.

Anti-Corruption Efforts in Honduras Are Gaining Steam (August 2023)
Efforts to establish an anti-impunity body in Honduras are slowly advancing more than one year after President Xiomara Castro first promised to combat corruption. On July 9, experts from the United Nations arrived in Honduras to assess the viability of the body, which has become known as the International Commission Against Impunity in Honduras (CICIH).

Honduran Government to file new tax reform before the National Congress (March 2023)
The Honduran Government announced that it will file before the National Congress the “Bill on Tax Justice,” which would significantly reform the current tax system. One of the main provisions would “add a worldwide income taxation principle that would tax all the local source and foreign source income, obtained by Honduran natural or legal persons, residents or domiciled, originated from the work or capital, or a combination of both.”

C-Libre Calls on Government to Repeal PCM (October 2022)
The Committee for Free Expression (C-Libre) called on the Government to immediately repeal PCM 023-2022, while demanding unrestricted respect for freedom of expression. In a statement C-Libre indicated that Decree No. PCM 023-2022 was published in the official newspaper, La Gaceta, and creates a directorate attached to the Secretariat of Strategic Planning that would establish at least four practices harmful to the freedom of the press and of expression.

Honduras Seeks to Install National Table for Citizen Participation (October 2022)
The National Table for Citizen Participation is proposed as bill to create a “national body for open dialogue, participation, and agreement between the various sectors of society, which will serve as support for the preparation and execution of policies and the actions of the Government of the Republic.” However, in the last 15 years, the reduction of civic and democratic spaces has been evident in Honduras due to, first, the co-optation by the state of civil society and, second, more and more civic spaces are restricted so that society cannot truly express itself.

ARCHIVED NEWS

Two Arrested for Massive COVID Hospital Fraud (April 2021)

Honduras After the Hurricanes: A Disaster that Demands Help (April 2021)

A Pandora’s box of corruption in Honduras (August 2019)

Honduras’ Congress Mounts Legal Attack Against Anti-Graft Body (May 2018)

Honduran workers’ rights activists face rising violence (May 2017)

New Tax Code Comes into Effect on January 1, 2017 (July 2016)

CSOs Implement Pilot System of Self-regulation (July 2016)

Civil Society Selects Judges (September 2015)