On May 1, 2020, India’s government made it mandatory for all central government officials to use the government-built Aarogya Setu app on their mobile phones. The app alerts users if a person in their vicinity has tested positive for Covid-19. The government also made the app mandatory in virus “containment zones” throughout the country. The app lacks privacy protections with the use of both Bluetooth and GPS and with little transparency about how the data will be handled. On April 10, the government of Maharashtra state also amended the Maharashtra Public Trust Act 1950, with Section 57A establishing a separate “Epidemic Disease Relief Fund & Disaster Relief Fund” on account of the coronavirus. The amendments require all public trusts to contribute a percentage of their gross annual income to the fund. For additional details, see ICNL’s COVID-19 Civic Freedom Tracker entry for India.
In March 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot brand an organization ‘political’ and deprive it of its right to receive foreign funds for using “legitimate forms of dissent.” However, the court approved foreign funding restrictions if an organization advocates for a political goal. In addition, the Finance Act, 2020 received the assent of the President on March 27, 2020 and is now law. Accordingly, all existing charitable and religious institutions already registered under Section 12A (trusts and institutions registered prior to 1996), Section 12AA (trusts and institutions registered after 1996), Section 10(23C) (certain educational and medical institutions) and Section 80G of the Act will be required to re-apply to the income tax authorities to revalidate their existing registrations. Please see the Barriers to Resources section below in this report for more information.
‘Civil Society’ is not a term commonly used in India, though in recent years the media has begun to adopt it. Civil society in India is largely equated with voluntary organizations or the more colloquially used term “NGO,” or non-governmental organization. The Central Statistical Institute of India announced in that as of 2009 there were 3.3 million NGOs registered in India, or one NGO for every 400 Indian citizens. GuideStar India (GSI) says it has the contact information of about 70,000 NGOs across India, and nearly 8,400 have been registered on their portal after verifying the organization’s registration as an NGO, its unique identity based on its tax number, and its operational existence based on proof of an address, as well as its voluntary consent to join the portal. There are also about 29,415 NGOs registered under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA).
The voluntary sector of India is noted for its vibrancy, innovation, and research-based advocacy. It has played an important role in supporting government as a partner in nation building. Historically, Indian voluntary development organizations have played three significant roles: first, in filling gaps in the government’s welfare systems, such as delivering basic services like health care, education, water, and sanitation to the most remote locations in the country; second, in research-based advocacy, such as analyzing the efficacy and reach of various government projects to provide guidance to the government for policy change; and, third in working on a rights-based approach and entitlements.
Civil society in India has been fairly organized and active pre- and post-Independence in 1947. India has a common law system, a British pre-Independence legacy. The legal framework is generally supportive of civil society. However, in practice, the government sometimes oversteps its regulatory role and instead tries to control the civic sector.
Amnesty International’s work in India, like elsewhere across the globe, is to uphold universal human rights and build a global movement of people who take injustice personally. These are the same values that are enshrined in the Indian Constitution and flow from a long and rich Indian tradition of pluralism, tolerance, and dissent.
|Organizational Forms||Trusts, Societies and Companies|
|Registration Body||State-level authorities.|
|Approximate Number||70,000 NGOs (according to Guide-Star India’s portal)|
|Barriers to Entry||It can take up to a year to complete all the registration procedures.|
|Barriers to Operations||The “advancement of any other object of general public utility” is not considered a charitable purpose under certain conditions. In addition, an institution or trust whose dominant object is political in character is said to not have been established for charitable purpose.|
|Barriers to Speech and/or Advocacy||NGOs cannot engage in political or legislative activities such as endorsing candidates for public office.|
|Barriers to International Contact||None.|
|Barriers to Resources||Significant restrictions under Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010 (FCRA).|
|Barriers to Assembly||Permission often required with conditions enforced, particularly at certain places; deportations and criminal sanctions against foreigners being ‘associated’ with protests; excessive force used often with wooden batons.|
|Population||1,351,133,673 (2018 est.)|
|Type of Government||Federal parliamentary constitutional republic|
|Life Expectancy at Birth||Male 67.6 years|
Female 70.1 years (2017 est.)
|Literacy Rate||Male: 81.3%|
Female: 60.6% (2015 est.)
|Religious Groups||Hindu 79.8%, Muslim 14.2%, Christian 2.3%, Sikh 1.7%, other and unspecified 2% (2011 est.)|
|Ethnic Groups||India has more than 2,000 ethnic groups|
|GDP per capita||$6,700 (2016 est.)|
Source: The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2015.
|Ranking Body||Rank||Ranking Scale|
(best – worst possible)
|UN Human Development Index||129( 2019)||1 – 187|
|World Bank Rule of Law Index||3 (2018)||100 – 0|
|World Bank Voice & Accountability Index||60 (2018)||100 – 0|
|Transparency International||41 (2019)||1 – 180|
|Freedom House: Freedom in the World||Status: Free|
Political Rights: 2
Civil Liberties: 3 (2018)
|Free/Partly Free/Not Free|
1 – 7
1 – 7
|Foreign Policy: Fragile States Index||74 (2019)||178 – 1|
International and Regional Human Rights Agreements
|Key International Agreements||Ratification*||Year|
|International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)||Yes||1979|
|Optional Protocol to ICCPR (ICCPR-OP1)||No||—|
|International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)||Yes||1979|
|International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)||Yes||1968|
|Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)||Yes||1993|
|Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women||No||—|
|Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)||Yes||1992|
|International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (ICRMW)||No||—|
|Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)||Yes||2007|
|South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)||Yes||1979|
|Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)||Yes||2014|
* Category includes ratification, accession, or succession to the treaty
The right of all citizens to form associations or unions is guaranteed by the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(c).
Article 19 guarantees the following six freedoms:
- Freedom of speech and expression, which allows an individual to take part in public activities. Though the words “freedom of press” are not mentioned in Article 19, “freedom of expression” also encompasses “freedom of press.” However, reasonable limitations can be imposed to maintain public order and to protect decorum and the dignity of the State.
- Freedom to assemble peacefully without arms, though the State can enforce reasonable limitations to maintain public order and the autonomy and integrity of India.
- Freedom to form associations or unions, with certain restrictions enforced by the State in the interest of public order, morality, and the sovereignty and integrity of India.
- Freedom to move freely throughout the territory of India, subject to certain restrictions to maintain the interest of the general public. For instance, the state can restrict travelling or commuting during epidemics to prevent it from spreading.
- Freedom to live and settle in any part of the territory of India, subject to certain limitations by the State to maintain the interest of the general public or to safeguard the rights of the native scheduled tribes and protect them from exploitation and oppression.
- Freedom to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. Here the state may impose justified limitations to protect the general public. Thus, nobody has the right to run a hazardous or corrupt business. Professional or technical qualifications may be required to practice any profession or carry out any particular business.
Non-profit organisations in India must not engage in political campaign activities or legislative activities. Indian not-for-profit entities may “lobby” for non-political causes, however, provided that such activity promotes “general public utility” and is incidental to the attainment of the charity’s objects. Under Section 20 of the Societies Registration Act of 1860, societies may have the diffusion of political education as their primary objective. In addition, under the Foreign Contributions Regulation Act, not-for-profit organizations involved in political activities cannot receive foreign contributions.
National Laws and Regulations Affecting Sector
1. Indian Trusts Act 1882
2. Societies Registration Act 1860
3. Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950 (state-level)
4. Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010
5. Indian Companies Act 2013
6. Direct Tax Code (replacing the Income Tax Act 1961)
7. Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment Rules 2015
8. Goods & Service Tax Act 2017
9. Finance Act 2020.
Pending NGO Legislative / Regulatory Initiatives
1. Additional Registration and Compliance for NGOs Implementing CSR Projects
The proposed new Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2020, if implemented, could have a significant impact. The existing Rule No. 4 under Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 would be replaced by the following provision:
(1) The Board shall ensure that the CSR activities are undertaken by the Company itself or through:
(a) a Company established under Section 8 of the Act, or
(b) any entity established under an Act of Parliament or a State legislature.
Provided that such company/entity, covered under clause (a) or (b), shall register itself with the central government for undertaking any CSR activity by filing the e-form CSR-1 with the Registrar along with prescribed fee.
Provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not affect the CSR projects or programmes that were approved prior to the commencement of the Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2020.”
If what is proposed above is implemented by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), a Company will be able to carry out CSR activities either:
- On its own; or
- Through its own corporate foundation, but only if it is established under Section 8 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013l or
- Through an implementing agency only if it is established under Section 8 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013; or
- Through an entity established under an Act of Parliament or a State legislature (i.e. a body corporate formed by a Special Act of Parliament or by the Central or State Legislature.
As interim relief, these new provisions would not affect ongoing CSR projects or programmes that were approved prior to the commencement of the Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2020. In addition, the requirement that a CSR implementing agency should have an established track record of three years in undertaking similar programs or projects will not be a requirement.
The effect of this proposal, if implemented, on existing CSR implementing agencies (Trusts and societies) would be significant. Some of the oldest corporate foundations and well-known NGOs are registered as Public Charitable Trusts. In fact, more non-profits in India are registered as Trusts and Societies than as Section 8 Companies ((formerly Section 25 Companies), which have become popular only in recent history.
2. Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, was introduced in Lok Sabha (lower house of parliament) on December 11, 2019, and is currently being analyzed in committee. There are concerns that the Bill gives the government blanket powers to access citizens’ data, and constitutes a serious threat to Indian citizens’ privacy.
3. Amendment to the Income Tax Law/proposed 2020 budget
On January 6, 2020, reports emerged that the new 2020 budget may include a provision making trustees personally liable in the case of violations of charitable trust norms linked to tax exemptions or registration of entities. This could enable authorities to seize trustees’ personal assets in case of an alleged breach, and have far reaching consequences for foundations and philanthropic organizations.
4. National Investigation Agency (NIA) Bill
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) Bill, 2019 passed in the Lok Sabha on July 15, 2019 and will now have to pass in the Rajya Sabha. The bill expands the NIA’s ability to investigate and prosecute offences, and allows for the creation of Special Courts for the trial of scheduled offences. The three major amendments are as follows:
– The Bill would enable the investigation of additional offences related to human trafficking, counterfeit currency, manufacturing or selling prohibited arms, cyber-terrorism, and offences under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. This expands the scope of the cases that can be investigated under the NIA Act, 2008.
– Officers of the NIA would have the power to investigate scheduled offences committed outside India, thereby expanding the NIA’s jurisdiction. The recent terror attack in Sri Lanka has been used to justify this provision.
– Sessions courts could be designated as special courts for the trial of scheduled offences. Under the original NIA Act, 2008 special courts are allowed for only NIA trials.
Critics of the amendments argued that “providing sweeping powers to police officers is not advisable at a time when the central agencies were being ‘misused’ for political vendetta,” with the Opposition deeming it an attempt to make India a police state.
5. Restrictive Right to Information Amendments
The Right to Information (Amendment) Bill, 2019 passed in both the lower (Lok Sabha) and upper house (Rajya Sabha) in July, and will become law once it receives presidential assent. The Bill amends India’s Right to Information Act, 2005 by allowing the central government to decide the tenure and conditions for information commissioners at both central and state levels. Experts say that these measures will dilute the law, reduce transparency, and take away the autonomy of the Central Information Commission (CIC), which is the highest appellate body on information applications. Seven former Information Commissioners have come together and outlined their opposition to the amendments, which were introduced in a secretive manner and handed to lawmakers only two days before they were tabled, with the government completely skipping the mandatory public disclosure and consultation process.
6. Proposed New Grounds for Cancelling Tax-Exempt Status of Nonprofits in India
The Indian government’s proposed 2019 budget would amend the Income Tax Act of 1961 by adding grounds on which the tax-exempt status of a nonprofit could be cancelled. In particular, under the proposed bill a nonprofit could lose its tax-exempt status at the discretion of the Tax Principal Commissioner or Commissioner if the nonprofit has violated any law material to achieving its objectives. This proposal threatens the independence of the nonprofit sector as it gives the government wide discretion to cancel the tax-exempt status of a nonprofit for even minor violations of the law. The budget passed the Lok Sabha on July 18, 2019 and the Rajya Sabha on July 23 and should be expected to become law imminently. Please see Account Aid and the Centre for Advancement for Philanthropy for detailed write ups on this proposed change.
7. Committee for “Light Regulation” of CSOs
A committee appointed by the central government on the orders of the Supreme Court has recommended several steps to ensure the “light regulation” of CSOs to reduce harassment of them. A shortened version of the recommendations is now before the Supreme Court, though the government has yet to accept the full set.
The committee, headed by S. Vijay Kumar, a former Secretary in the Ministry of Rural Development, was formed as part of the response to the ongoing writ petition filed by Manohar Lal Sharma. On the Supreme Court’s suggestion, the committee has also drawn up a framework of guidelines for the accreditation of CSOs through Niti Ayog, auditing their accounts, and procedures to initiate action to recover grants in cases of misappropriation.
The committee has recommended the following:
- The registration procedures should be modernized to facilitate the seamless operation of the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act and the FCRA with respect to CSOs, without the need for cumbersome and intrusive processes.
- Steps must be taken to reduce the need for in-person interactions between CSOs and public officials acting under the Income Tax Act and FCRA.
- A separate law is needed for voluntary agencies engaged in activities of a charitable or “public good” nature to enable more effective and efficient regulation of the sector.
- Regulation should be “light” and consistent with fundamental rights, in order to give effect to the objects for which voluntarism is being promoted.
- Various state-level and existing central laws should be replaced by overarching legislation based on best practices.
- Details of CSOs should be available as searchable database information.
- The new framework should enable “national uniformity” of approach following the principle of “cooperative federalism.”
8. Voluntary Action Cell (VAC)
Niti Aayog (formerly called the Planning Commission) has formed a Voluntary Action Cell (VAC) and constituted a working/standing committee on “Institutionalization of Engagement of Service Delivery Civil Society Organizations (CSOs).” The standing committee met on March 16, 2018 decided to create five sub-groups. One of the sub-groups will deal with self-regulation and the national regulatory framework for the voluntary sector.
9. Unique Identification Number (UIN)
The Government proposes to create a National Register of all charitable and religious institutions, and the Income Tax Department will issue a Unique Identification Number (UIN) to all charitable and religious institutions. This will likely be a positive development and assist with proper collection of data and analysis of that data.
We are currently unaware of any other pending initiatives. Please help keep us informed; if you are aware of pending initiatives, write to ICNL at email@example.com.
An NGO can register itself first at the state level either as a public charitable trust or as a society under the Societies Registration Act of 1860 or as a company under Section 8 of the Indian Companies Act of 2013 (formerly Section 25 of the Indian Companies Act of 1956).
While the Indian Companies Act of 2013 is central/federal legislation, the Trusts Acts and Societies Acts vary from state to state. In Maharashtra State, for example, there is the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act of 1950. The same Act is applicable in neighboring Gujarat State, but with some variations. In states that do not have a Trusts Act, the principles of the Indian Trusts Act of 1882 apply. The Societies Registration Act of 1860 also varies from state to state. For example, a society registered in Maharashtra or Gujarat does not have to renew its registration. However, societies registered in the northeastern states must renew their registrations annually.
To enjoy tax exemption and provide tax deductions to donors, NGOs must register “u/s 12AA” and “u/s 80G” respectively under the Income Tax Act 1961.
Every NGO receiving funds from “foreign sources” must either obtain prior permission or register under the Foreign Contributions Regulation Act (FCRA) of 2010. Apart from these key pieces of legislation, labour laws or goods & services tax (GST) laws that also apply, depending on the size or nature of activities an NGO undertakes. For example, any NGO employing more than 20 employees must comply with the the Employees’ Provident Fund (compliance is voluntary if an NGO has less than 20 employees). GST laws would apply if turnover of goods or commercial services exceeds a sum of two million Indian rupees in any fiscal year.
Public charitable trusts may be established for many purposes, including poverty relief, education, medical relief, providing facilities for recreation, and any other objective of general public utility. Indian public trusts are generally irrevocable. No national law governs public charitable trusts in India, although many states, particularly Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh, have Public Trusts Acts. In these states, a trust can be registered with the State Charity Commissioner. In states where there is no Charity Commissioner or Trusts Act in force, the Deed of Trust may simply be registered with the office of the Registrar of Deeds/Assurances.
Societies are membership organizations that may be registered for charitable purposes. They are usually managed by a governing council or a managing committee and are regulated by the Societies Registration Act of 1860, which has been adopted by various states. Unlike trusts, societies may be dissolved. Virtually every state in India has a Registrar of Societies where a society can be registered.
The Indian Companies Act of 1956 has been replaced by the new Indian Companies Act of 2013. The new Act came into force on April 1, 2014, and the old Section 25 has now become Section 8 with further additions.
According to Section 8, The Central Government may issue a license to a limited or private limited company that “(a) has as its objects the promotion of commerce, art, science, sports, education, research, social welfare, religion, charity, protection of environment or any such other object; (b) intends to apply its profits, if any, or other income in promoting its objects; and (c) intends to prohibit the payment of any dividend to its members.”
Thus, a not-for-profit company may be registered with the Registrar of Companies.
Public Benefit Status
To be eligible for tax exemption under the Income Tax Act of 1961, a not-for-profit entity must be established for religious or charitable purposes. Charitable purposes include “relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility.” The Finance (No.2) Act of 2009 added “preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest” to the list of charitable purposes.
Previously, institutions established for a “charitable purpose” falling under the category of “advancement of any other object of general public utility” were under threat of losing their tax exemption if income from their “business activity” exceeded Rs. 2.5 million during the financial year. This provision was amended with a requirement that for the institution to retain its tax exemption, any activity related to trade, commerce, or business or any activity rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce, or business for a cess [tax] or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application or retention of the income from such activity, must meet the following criteria:
- Such activity must be undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object of general public utility and
- The aggregate receipts from such activity or activities during the previous year do not exceed twenty per cent of the total receipts of the trust or institution under such activity or activities of that previous year.
Public charitable trusts, by definition, must be created for the benefit of the public. Societies may be registered for charitable purposes, among other purposes. Section 25/8 companies are formed for the purposes of promotion of commerce, art, science, sports, education, research, social welfare, religion, charity, protection of the environment, or any other object.
Section 135 of the Indian Companies Act of 2013 requires every company having net worth of Rs. 500/- crore (Rs. 5 Billion) or more, or turnover of Rs. 1,000/- crore (Rs. 10 Billion) or more, or net profit of Rs. 5 crore (Rs. 50 Million) or more, to establish a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee of its board and disclose the composition of the CSR committee in the board’s report; formulate a CSR policy and spend at least 2% of its aggregate net profit over the block of the previous three years on CSR activities as outlined under Schedule VII of the Indian Companies Act, 2013; and disclose the CSR activities and amounts spent in the company’s annual report.
Several not-for-profit Section 8 Companies have been served with a Show Cause Notice under Section 134(8) for violation of Section 134(3)(O) read with Section 135 of the Indian Companies Act, 2013. One such organization, for example, runs centers in major cities of India where children afflicted with cancer and their families receive shelter, healthcare, and nutritional support. Section 8 companies that are registered as tax exempt organizations under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act of 1961 are required to spend at least 85% of their total income each financial year. It is therefore odd that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs is insisting that such organizations should spend a mere 2% on CSR activities.
Barriers to Entry
The law does not specifically or explicitly prohibit the formation and operation of “unregistered” groups. In fact, the Income Tax Act of 1961 recognizes both registered and unregistered associations of persons. However, the Ministry of Home Affairs also makes it clear that FCRA registration or prior permission is mandatory for an association (registered or unregistered) to receive contributions from any foreign source.
There are no sanctions or penalties for carrying out activities through an unregistered organization, although there are tax implications.
A trust, society, or Section 8 company can be established by either a company or individuals. A trust or company can be established by two individuals, whereas a society requires seven founding members. A trust may be settled with a token sum of money (Rs. 500/-), which would then be considered ‘Trust Property’. A society requires no initial capital, and a Section 8 company can be established with or without share capital.
Under the Indian Trusts Act of 1882, “a trust may be created by every person competent to contract.” Under Indian Contract Act of 1872, “Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.”
There is no specific bar on foreigners as founders or trustees under the Bombay Public Trusts Act of 1950, the Indian Companies Act of 2013, the Societies Registration Act of 1860, or the Income Tax Act of 1961.
There is a specific bar only under the FCRA, which applies only if the NGO is seeking a foreign contribution.
Registration fees are nominal. However, the registration process moves slowly: often it takes several months and sometimes up to a year to get all the registrations. FCRA applications are required by law to be processed within a period of 3 months, but it generally takes much longer. The government has the right to deny registration or even suspend or cancel an existing registration (income tax exemption or an FCRA registration) for violation of any provision of the statute or the rules thereunder, but they must allow due process and give the NGO an opportunity to be heard. If an NGO’s registration is refused or canceled, the NGO has the right of redress before a higher competent authority.
Generally, as long as the objects of the NGO as stated in its charter document are for a charitable purpose, it may take some time to receive the registration, but it will not be denied. An existing registration may be cancelled for reasons such as not functioning in line with the stated objects, failure to file returns, or violation of any provision of the law.
Barriers to Operational Activity
As long as the activities of the NGO are within the framework of a charitable purpose, the law does not impose burdens or constraints on the NGO’s operations.
According to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, “charitable purpose” includes:
- Relief of the poor
- Medical relief
- Preservation of the environment (including watersheds, forests, and wildlife)
- Preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest
- The advancement of any other object of general public utility.
Amendments made under the Finance Acts of 2008, 2010, 2011, and 2015 have affected all organizations falling under the sixth category, “The advancement of any other object of general public utility.”
According the 2015 amendment of the Finance Act 2015: “the advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention, of the income from such activity, unless:
(i) such activity is undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object of general public utility; and
(ii) The aggregate receipts from such activity or activities during the previous year do not exceed twenty per cent of the total receipts, of the trust or institution undertaking such activity or activities, of that fiscal year.”
One could argue that “improvement of democracy and governance in India through political and electoral reforms” could be deemed as a charitable purpose under the category “Advancement of any other object of general public utility,” as long as the organization is not involved in “carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business for any fee, tax or other consideration,” even if the aggregate value of receipts from such activity does not exceed twenty percent of the total receipts of the trust or institution in that fiscal year.
However, courts in India have held that an institution or trust whose dominant object is political in character cannot be said to have been established for charitable purpose [Lokamanya Tilak Jubilee National Trust Fund,  10 ITR 26 (Bom.); CIT v. All India Hindu Mahasabha  140 ITR 748 (Delhi)]. In the Lokamanya Tilak case, a trust was created to give effect to the wishes of Lokmanya Tilak as expressed in his will. The trust was created for spreading political education through the Kesari and Maratha newspapers to raise public awareness of political rights and demanding changes in the structure of the country’s administration. However, the Supreme Court held that the trust was not a public charitable trust as defined under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. The court’s position is summarized in Halsbury’s Laws of England: “A trust for the attainment of political objects is invalid, not because it is illegal — for everyone is at liberty to advocate or promote by any lawful means a change in the law, but because the court has no means of judging whether a proposed change in the law will or will not be for the public welfare or benefit, and therefore cannot say that a gift to secure the change is a charitable gift.” This argument was also advanced by Lord Parkar in Bowman v. Secular Society Limited.
Political purposes include, but also extend beyond, the support of political parties or of those seeking political office. Supporting or opposing a change to the law or government policy is a political purpose and not a charitable purpose. In addition, attempts to sway public opinion on controversial social issues are legitimate and lawful but not charitable.
A purpose pursued by an NGO would be considered political if:
- It is concerned with party politics;
- It involves the dissemination of ‘propaganda’ for some cause; or
- It involves seeking changes to the law, to the administration of the law, or to government policy.
It is the third of these notions of “political” that creates difficulties for activist welfare organizations. English courts and other Commonwealth country courts, including India, deem activities such as advocating changes to the law as “political,” reasoning that a purpose cannot be held to be charitable unless it is beneficial to the public. Accordingly, when a court has to decide whether a trust or other organization which aims to change the law, the administration of the law, or some government policy is charitable, it must determine whether the change sought would be beneficial. But a court, whose task is to resolve disputes according to existing law, cannot rule on whether a particular change to the law would or would not be beneficial.
NGOs are independent concerning internal governance. The government has the right to regulate but not control the internal affairs of an NGO. Fines and penalties may be imposed for compounding certain irregularities such as not filing returns in time. NGOs may also be subject to random financial or tax assessments by the regulatory authorities.
The Finance Bill of 2017
The Finance Bill of 2017 was approved after modifications by both Houses of Parliament and received the assent of the President of India on March 31, 2017. It brought about several changes to the voluntary sector in India:
1) Restrictions on inter-charity corpus donations
One charitable organization may contribute funds to another charitable organization but not as a corpus donation or grant.
2) Restrictions on cash donations
Sub-section 5D of section 80G has been amended to lower the limit on cash donations under section 80G to 2000 rupees. The move is in line with the government’s overall efforts to promote a cashless economy and increase transparency.
3) Expansion of power of survey inspection
Amended section 133A now expressly empowers the Income Tax Authority to enter any places of “activity of charitable purpose” to inspect the account books, verify cash, stock, or valuable articles, or furnish any relevant information.
Finally, in 2018 the Maharashtra State Charity Commissioner issued an order directing around 400 NGOs and trusts registered in the state to remove the words “corruption” and “human rights” from their names or risk a suspension under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act of 1950. The charity commissioner’s office in Pune had previously taken similar action against 16 NGOs with the word “corruption” in their names, including Anna Hazare’s Bhrashtachar Virodhi Jan Andolan, which was suspended. The NGO’s case to regain its registration is pending in court. According to press reports, the State Charity Commissioner believes that only the government has the machinery to prevent corruption and protect human rights.
Barriers to Speech / Advocacy
There are no specific restrictions on the ability of NGOs to criticize the government or to advocate for politically unpopular causes, including issues of human rights and democracy. However, NGOs cannot engage in political or legislative activities such as endorsing candidates for public office. NGOs have nonetheless often been successful in advocacy work, especially on issues such as children’s rights and marginalized communities, and they have thus indirectly influenced the drafting of more enabling laws and policies.
On March 24, 2015, India’s Supreme Court declared Section 66A of the Information Technology Act (“IT Act”) as unconstitutional. Prior to this, section 66A of the IT Act was often misused by politicians, political parties, and their followers to silence critics through the power to arrest and jail those who spoke out, especially on social media. As a result of the decision, Internet content cannot be removed without a court order, and the threat of arrest for posting content on the Internet is gone. The court, however, upheld the validity of section 69B and the 2011 guidelines for the implementation of the IT Act, which allow the government to block websites if their content has the potential to create communal disturbance, social disorder, or affect India’s relationship with other countries.
Most recently, on October 25, 2018, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) of the Department of Revenue took action against Amnesty international in Bengaluru 20 days after the ED conducted searches of Greenpeace’s office in the same city. On charges of an FCRA violation, the ED confiscated various documents and even individual laptops. Before this raid, Amnesty International had issued a statement that raids on media houses were an attempt to hinder the free press. According to reports, Aakar Patel, the Executive Director of Amnesty India, had said that the Income Tax Department’s search on Quintillion Media Private Ltd, which runs a news website The Quint, and the homes of its owners, Raghav Bahl and Ritu Kapoor, indicated a clampdown on the free press.
According to a statement issued by the ED, after Amnesty International India Foundation Trust (AIIFT) was denied permission/registration under FCRA by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), AIIFT bypassed FCRA by floating a commercial entity in the name of Amnesty International India Pvt. Ltd (AIIPL). This entity, according to the ED, had received Rs 36 crore of foreign funds through a commercial route, of which 10 crore was received as long term loans. This amount was immediately placed in fixed deposits (FDs) and another Indian entity, Indians for Amnesty International Trust (IAIT), established an overdraft facility for Rs. 14.25 crore with the Rs.10 crore FD as collateral. The remaining Rs.26 crore was received in two other bank accounts of AIIPL as “consultancy services.”
Explanation 3 to Section 2(1)(h) of FCRA states that “Any amount received, by any person from any foreign source in India, by way of fee (including fees charged by an educational institution in India from foreign student) or towards cost in lieu of goods or services rendered by such person in the ordinary course of his business, trade or commerce whether within India or outside India or any contribution received from an agent or a foreign source towards such fee or cost shall be excluded from the definition of foreign contribution within the meaning of this clause” (italics added for emphasis).
The ED appears to believe that Amnesty International took advantage of this loophole and received contributions from a foreign source for a definite charitable, religious, economic, education, or social purpose under the cover of “commercial transactions” and thus violated FCRA.
Earlier, in 2016, the Bengaluru police had filed a sedition case against Amnesty International based on a complaint filed by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad for organizing a program that sought to portray the human suffering from the Kashmir conflict. The police charged Amnesty India with sedition under section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. Sedition is defined as “whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law.” The government also filed cases against Amnesty’s representatives under sections 142, 143, 147, and 149 for unlawful assembly and rioting and Section 153a for promoting enmity between groups.
The separate ED crackdown on Greenpeace occurred on October 5, 2018, when its offices were raided in Bengaluru and its bank accounts frozen for alleged FCRA violations and “raising funds through fraudulent means.” The ED also claimed to have found “important evidence” of corrupt practices by Greenpeace India. Greenpeace India is the Indian branch of the global environmental group Greenpeace and claims it receives 60% of its funding from individual donors in India and does not, as a policy, receive any funding from the government or companies. In 2015, the central government had cancelled the FCRA registration of Greenpeace and accused it of being involved in “anti-national activities,” a charge denied by Greenpeace.
Restrictions on Amnesty surfaced again on November 15, 2019, when India’s federal investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), conducted searches at the offices of Amnesty International India Private Limited (a for-profit entity) and Indians for Amnesty International Trust (a not-for-profit entity) in Banga