Sierra Leone default flag

Sierra Leone

Last updated: October 2, 2023

Recent Developments

While we aim to maintain information that is as current as possible, we realize that situations can rapidly change. If you are aware of any additional information or inaccuracies on this page, please keep us informed; write to ICNL at ngomonitor@icnl.org.

Introduction

The size and influence of civil society in Sierra Leone has seen huge growth since the end of the civil conflict in 2002. Prior to the conflict, the country had several professional and trade union organizations, but they were not as influential and active as they have become since 2002. CSOs only became particularly active during and after the conflict.

Civil society in Sierra Leone today be categorized into four types, which have different aims.

  • First, there are not-for-profit, membership-based professional bodies, which largely are concerned with the welfare of their profession.
  • Second, there are not-for-profit service delivery-based CSOs and development organizations, which largely seek grant and contract funding to address service delivery gaps.
  • Third, there are civic organizations, which are primarily concerned with the pursuit of good governance and the maximization of citizens’ economic, social, political and civil rights.
  • Finally, the fourth category of CSO is social clubs or mutual benefit organizations, which are membership-based organizations that focus on providing welfare benefits for their members. In past years, these organizations have collectively helped to foster accountability and transparency in government, address service delivery gaps, and protect the interests of their members.

Sierra Leone practices a multi-party, presidential system of government. Only two political parties – the ruling Sierra Leone Peoples Party (SLPP) and opposition All People’s Congress (APC) – have governed the country since independence in 1961. The Constitution, which was passed in 1991, provides for separation powers, but the executive arm is clearly more powerful and seems to wield huge control over both the judiciary and legislative arms. In spite of efforts to enhance access to justice for persons across the country through the Legal Aid Board and additional recruitment of judges and magistrates, the judiciary is perceived to be corrupt and largely unresponsive to the justice needs of the people.

132 of the 146 Members of Parliament are elected by universal suffrage whilst the others (Paramount Chief Members of Parliament) are elected by their peers. In Sierra Leone, customary law and English common law operate in tandem, rather than in conflict. Local courts, which are now part of the judiciary and supervised by the Chief Justice, administer customary law to a significant percentage of the population living outside the Western Area, including regulating matters of marriage, divorce, succession, and land tenure. Sierra Leone has made tremendous progress in the fight against corruption in recent years, but corruption is still pervasive and endemic in both the public and private sphere.

The Sierra Leone government has since 1994 taken steps to regulate or define the role of CSOs in the country. The 1994 policy was reviewed in 2003 and 2009 by the former Kabbah and Koroma administrations, respectively. Efforts to introduce a more restrictive policy in 2016 were resisted by civil society.  In December 2018, however, the government approved a policy that has been roundly criticized by CSOs as simply “a tool of the Government of Sierra Leone to unduly control CSOs, narrow the civic space, and potentially silence dissenting voices.”

That policy, known as the Development Cooperation Framework (DCF) or NGO Policy, includes a regulatory and accountability framework for both CSOs and development partners in Sierra Leone. The government claims that the policy seeks to promote transparency and accountability in the operations of CSOs whilst at the same time ensuring better coordination in the sector. CSOs hold a different view and have rejected it since the first day it was passed. Among other concerns, the Policy provides that all development assistance channeled through CSOs must be aligned with the national development priorities and should be properly coordinated with the government. CSOs must sign Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with their respective sector ministries before they can commence operations. In addition, the Policy provides for onerous registration and renewal procedures, including multiple reporting obligations.

Overall, the years of deep-seated mistrust between civil society and government is not improving in the country. This was evidenced by the fact that following a two-day conference in Freetown, the civil society consortium, National Elections Watch (NEW), issued a communique on June 21, 2022 in which it asserted that “there have been attempts, since the 2018 elections, to shrink the civic space using various approaches.” In response to the communique, however, the Secretary-General of the ruling Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) issued a press statement accusing NEW of being unfair and biased against the SLPP.

This Civic Freedom Monitor (CFM) country note was made possible through the research conducted by Ibrahim Tommy, Executive Director of the Centre for Accountabilty and Rule of Law.

Civic Freedoms at a Glance

Organizational FormsNon-Governmental Organization (NGO), Not-for-Profit Company (NPC), and Community-Based Organization (CBO)
Registration BodyNGOs: Ministry of Finance and Economic Development
NPCs: Registry’s Department
CBOs: Ministry of Social Welfare or local governments/councils
Barriers to FormationNGOs are confronted by a number of barriers including: (1) Establishment criteria include at least 5 staff persons, office space, sign board, etc; (2) Registration procedures require NGOs to sign an agreement with the government and potentially subject NGOs to field verification visits and in-person interviews; and (3) Re-registration is required every two years.
Barriers to OperationsNGOs are subject to a number of barriers, including (1) NGOs must conclude an agreement with the government before commencing operations; (2) Stringent and detailed reporting requirements apply to NGOs; (3) Membership in SLANGO, an umbrella organization, is essentially mandated by law; and (4) Unless all requirements are met, including a satisfactory inspection of the offices, the application will not be submitted to the NGO National Supervisory Committee for consideration.
Barriers to ResourcesThe law does not impose any barriers on how much funds can be raised by NGOs, however, the new policy imposes a limit on the indirect costs budget. The guidelines provide that only 30% of all funds can be spent on indirect expenses, while 70% of the total funds must go toward items/services that are directly project-related. A lot of NGOs have had difficulty adjusting their budgets to abide by the new policy.
Barriers to ExpressionThe Public Order Act 1965 prohibits and criminalizes the reporting of false news and places the burden of proof on the accused. It is also criminal to participate in any demonstration or procession without the approval of the head of the police.
Barriers to AssemblyUnclear definition of “procession” and excessive penalties for minor violations.
ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS

Civil society organizations (CSOs) seeking legal entity status may assume one of the following organizational forms in Sierra Leone:

Non-Governmental Organization

A non-governmental organization (NGO) is defined by the Development Cooperation (NGO Policy) Framework (DCF) as “any independent, not for profit making, non-partisan and charitable organization, with the primary objective of enhancing the social, environmental, cultural and economic well-being of communities without any form of religious, political, or ethnic discrimination in line with existing policy and legal framework.” (Article 5.1) According to the NGO Policy, NGOs are required to register with the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MoPED). Registration with the umbrella organization, Sierra Leone Association of Non-governmental Organizations (SLANGO), however, is optional.

According to the NGO Policy, NGOs are required to register with the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MOPED). Registration with the umbrella organization, Sierra Leone Association of Non-governmental Organizations (SLANGO), is optional.

Not-for-Profit Company

A not-for-profit company (NPC) is regulated under the Companies Act 2009 and registers with the Corporate Affairs Department, which is an independent body for the registration of companies doing business in Sierra Leone. NPCs can be formed for various purposes, including member or community benefits.

They are allowed to engage in business activity, provided the profit is used to further the not-for-profit purposes of the organization.

Community Based Organization

There is no law, policy, or regulation that specifically governs community-based organizations (CBOs). The DCF does not cover the activities of CBOs. In practice, a CBO can either register with local government councils or with the Ministry of Social Welfare. The DCF is being reviewed as of November 2022 and there are suggestions that civic groups and CBOs may be covered in the revised document.

PUBLIC BENEFIT STATUS

There is no public benefit or tax exempt status that is generally available for all CSOs in Sierra Leone.  Instead, certain organizational forms are conceived of as specialized forms, which are subject to limited permissible purposes and supported by specific fiscal incentives.  For example:

  • NGOs are accorded public benefit status and therefore qualify for tax exemptions under the National Revenue Authority Act and the NGO Policy. NGOs may be eligible for a waiver from import duties as well.
  • Not-for-profit companies are exempt from certain taxes and may be granted a duty-free waiver under the Public Finance Management Act 2019.  Not-for-profit companies can also engage in economic activities, provided that the profit is used to further the not-for-profit purposes of the organization.
  • Community-based organizations and other CSOs are not granted “public benefit” or tax-exempt status.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

In November 2020, a civil society-government dialogue series was held to address the communication gap that exists between them. At the inaugural meeting, President Bio urged government officials to “infuse more candor and transparency in government business through regular interactions with civil society as representatives of the interests of our people.” At least two other similar dialogue sessions were subsequently organized.

BARRIERS TO FORMATION

Many CSOs are unregistered and operate freely, provided that they carry out their activities within the confines of the law. There is no penalty for operating unregistered groups in Sierra Leone. However, the activities of NGOS that refuse or fail to renew their registration may be suspended by the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MoPED).

The law is permissive with respect to potential founders of CSOs.  Anyone may form a not-for-profit company or a CBO, including both foreigners and Sierra Leoneans. The same is generally true for NGOs as well; the only limitation is that founders/members of an NGO should not consist of people from one family.

Establishment requirements vary depending on the organizational form.  To set up a CBO requires initial founding members of at least five people living in the community.  To form a not-for-profit company, the law requires a board and founding subscribers.  To establish an NGO, the policy requires at least four full/part time staff (excluding messengers and drivers, but including secretaries).  In addition, NGOs are required an organizational bank account.

In order to be registered as an NGO, applicants must submit a Letter of request for NGO status addressed to Development Secretary or Permanent Secretary of Line Ministry. There are a number of registration requirements and rules that raise potential concerns, depending on the implementation.  They include the following:

  • NGO applicants may be required to attend an interview with the NGO Unit;
  • Successful NGO applicants must sign a “Service Level Agreement with each line ministry of operation”;
  • Registration fees are determined periodically by the NGO Supervisory Committee;
  • NGO applicants are permitted to re-submit an application, following an initial denial of registration, but have no right to appeal the denial to an independent arbiter.

In practice, some NGOs are subject to excessive delays. The Society for Democratic Initiatives, for example, was forced to wait for nearly two years after it filed for registration with the e Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MOFED). NGO registration is valid only for two years, and therefore must be renewed on a regular basis. Renewal of registration is dependent on the submission of documentation and an “independent assessment of the performance of NGOs” by MOPED. In order to satisfy MOFED, NGOs must submit any or all of the following:

  • A summary of final donor project narrative and financial reports;
  • Audit reports on projects or the organization itself; and/or
  • Copy of most recent certificate of registration from MOPED.

A certification of incorporation can be issued for not-for-profit companies based on the submission of a detailed Memorandum of Association, which includes information on the partners, board and name and place of business. The law allows for no appeal from a denial of registration; instead, the applicant has the right to re-apply.

CBOs are required to submit a constitution, list of members in the community, and a report on past activities; and to pay a fee to the Ministry of Social Welfare and Children’s Affairs or Local Councils. Here again the government can deny registration, but this seldom happens.

Foreign NGOs need accreditation from their government or embassy, proving their legal status and credibility before they can operate in Sierra Leone.

BARRIERS TO OPERATIONS

NGOs are subject to several legal barriers affecting their operational activity.

First, NGOs must sign an “Agreement” with the government before they can commence operations.  This is interpreted to mean that every project implemented in Sierra Leone by NGOs must be approved by the sectoral ministry concerned and by the MOPED. No project shall be implemented by an NGO in the country without prior approval.

Second, NGOs are subject to stringent reporting and supervisory requirements. NGOs must submit annual reports for all projects implemented. NGOs must submit details of “all funds committed by donors for project implementation,” including the amount committed, sources of funding, details of donors and any details of installment arrangements or other donor requirements.  And NGOs are subject to site visits without prior notice.

Third, the NGO Policy states that all assets purchased or acquired with donor funds should be the property of the people of Sierra Leone who are the beneficiaries – rather than of the NGO itself.

Fourth, NGOs are subject to sanctions (which could include cancellation of duty-free concessions and/or suspension or cancellation of certificate of registration) for failing to comply with the provisions of the NGO Policy, for acting in contravention of its stated objectives, and where the “NGO shows by its nature, composition and operations over the years that it is not developing/promoting the capacity of Sierra Leoneans in the management of its operations.”

In addition, a major concern for the sector relates to the role of the Sierra Leone Association of Non-governmental Organizations (SLANGO). Membership in SLANGO is optional, but NGOs are advised that registration with SLANGO is an advantage. It seems to be a key factor in the government’s decision on annual re-registration. In effect, therefore, SLANGO is arguably becoming an instrumentality of government, rather than a truly independent umbrella group and voice for the NGO sector. Unannounced “stop and check” operations have also been carried out in the countryside by government reportedly on the instruction of SLANGO to restrict the movement of vehicles without NGO registration bumper stickers.

In June 2022, members of the Parliamentary Oversight Committee on National Commission for Social Action (NaCSA) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) summoned 22 NGOs operating in the country to provide an account of their operations and funds received on behalf of the people of Sierra Leone. The Committee demanded that each of the invited NGOs submit 17 copies of their status update, including a list of ongoing and completed projects, locations, beneficiaries of projects, cost of projects, donors of projects, current status of projects, breakdown of donor-funded projects, implementing partners, proof of compliance with the service level agreement with the MoPED, and any other relevant information.

Finally, CSO activists have on several occasions been victims of death threats, smear attacks, police detention and attacks on property. No official statements from government condemning the threats and attacks were issued. The government, however, should have a role in providing a secure environment for all of its citizens, civil society activists included.

BARRIERS TO RESOURCES

There are no legal barriers to funding sources for civil society in Sierra Leone

NGOs are expected, however, to disclose all funding sources to the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development (MoPED).  This includes “sources of funding,” “details of donors and any details of installment arrangement or other donor requirements (Article 2.7 of the NGO Policy 2009).” Furthermore,  NGO registration renewal requires the “submission of a list of assets acquired in the past two years and evidence of having surrendered assets for projects completed to the line ministry or as determined by the Minister of Planning and Economic Development.” It is still unclear how such NGO Policy provisions will be implemented in practice.

In June 2022, members of the Parliamentary Oversight Committee on National Commission for Social Action (NaCSA) and NGOs summoned 22 NGOs operating in the country to provide an account of their operations and funds received on behalf of the people of Sierra Leone. The Committee demanded that each of the invited NGOs submit seventeen copies of their status update, including a list of ongoing and completed projects, their locations and beneficiaries of the projects, cost of the projects, donors of the projects, current status of the projects, breakdown of donor-funded projects, implementing partners, proof of compliance with the Service Level Agreement with the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development, and any other relevant information and staff payee.

BARRIERS TO EXPRESSION

Sierra Leone repealed Part V of the Public Order Act (POA) 1965, which criminalized libel and sedition. The Act prohibited and criminalized the reporting of false news and placed the burden of proof on the accused. However, the POA still requires police approval for citizens/activists to organize any demonstration or procession in protest over a public interest matter.

While the DCF/NGO Policy does not expressly exclude NGOs from advocating on human rights issues and political advocacy, the definition in the Policy seems to suggest that NGO cannot or may not directly participate in such activities. However, civic groups, including those registered as not-for-profit companies and community-based organizations, can advocate on such issues, including criticizing the government.

On October 6, 2022, lawyer and opposition politician Ady Macauley was arrested and detained by the police for alleged incitement after he expressed an opinion on the country’s freedom of assembly laws. Macauley appeared to have stated on a television show that citizens do not need a police permit to assemble and that he would defend anyone who gets arrested for having protested without a police permit. Several days after his comments, there were violent protests in Freetown and other parts of the country after which his comments were deemed to constitute an offence of incitement. Although he was released on bail, investigations into his comments have been ongoing.

In 2022, accusations of “incitement” have been used to chill opposition movement. For example, on July 3, 2022 opposition politicians Madam Femi Claudius Cole and Dr. Dennis Bright were arrested and detained for what the police referred to as “incitement”. On July 4, the police further arrested 57 people in Freetown, Lungi, Port Loko, Mile 91, and Magburaka for “organizing or participating in an unauthorized demonstration” in contravention of the Public Order Act 1965. Half a year later, on October 6, 2022, lawyer and opposition politician Ady Macauley was arrested and detained by the police for alleged “incitement” after he expressed an opinion on the country’s freedom of assembly laws. Macauley appeared to have stated on a television show that citizens do not need a police permit to assemble and that he would defend anyone who gets arrested for having protested without a police permit. Several days after his comments, there were violent protests in Freetown and other parts of the country, which led to his comments being deemed as an offence of “incitement.” Although he was released on bail, investigations into his comments have been ongoing.

BARRIERS TO ASSEMBLY

Article 26 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone protects the freedom of assembly: Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of assembly and association, that is to say, his right to assemble freely and associate with other persons and in particular to form or belong to any political party, trade unions or other economic, social or professional associations, national or international, for the protection of his interests.

The exercise of freedom of assembly is regulated by the Public Order Act (POA), 1965 and the Police Act, 1964, as amended.

Advance Permission 

Part III of the POA on “Processions” requires organizers of assemblies to obtain a permit from the Sierra Leone Commissioner of Police in advance of a “procession” (processions are undefined in the Act). Failure to obtain permission before carrying out a procession is grounds for the police to disperse the procession. Anyone who refuses to obey an order to disperse or anyone who carries out an action that violates the conditions of the permit is liable to a fine not exceeding $12 or six months in prison, or both (Section 17(4)). No exceptions to the permit requirement are made for spontaneous processions, except in the case of events such as circumcisions, funerals, marriages, scouts or girl guide outings, and school activities (Section 17(5a-e)).

In addition, “Any person who intends to convene or hold a public meeting at any place in the provinces shall first notify in writing the Paramount Chief of the Chiefdom (Section 24(1)).” The Paramount Chief may “disallow the convening or holding of the public meeting in any place in the Provinces or impose such conditions as he may consider necessary on any such meeting where the interests of defence, public order, public safety or public morality reasonably so require (Section 24(2)).”

Under Section 24(4), “Any person found guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding two hundred leones or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months or both.” “Public Meetings” are undefined in the POA.

Penalties 

Anyone who deviates from the prescribed route specified in the permit for a procession or who refuses to comply with traffic rules commits an offence. A person guilty of an offence is liable on summary conviction for a first offence to a fine not exceeding $5. For a second or subsequent offence, a person is liable to a fine not exceeding $12 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months (Sections 30 and 31 of the Police Act 1964, as amended).

Any organizer or participant who takes part in a procession that has been disallowed by the Inspector-General of Police or who has failed to comply with the conditions imposed in the permit is guilty of an offence under subsection 3 of section 17 of the Public Order Act (POA), 1965. Anyone guilty of an offence under section 17 of the POA is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding 200 Leones or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months or both (Section 17(4) POA 1965).

Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions 

Section 19(1) of the POA requires that anyone taking part in a procession keep to the left of the middle line of any road used for the procession and comply with police instructions about the route to be followed. Section 19(2) states that any interference with vehicular or pedestrian traffic is an offence for which the person is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding 10 Leones or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding one month or both.

In addition, “any person who within 500 yards of the precincts of the House of Representatives is guilty of any riotous, indecent, disorderly or insulting behaviour, shall on conviction be liable to a fine of one hundred leones or to imprisonment for six months or to both such fine and imprisonment (Section 23(3)).”

Certain conduct is also prohibited during processions. For instance, section 20(1) of the POA states that no person is permitted during a procession (except with permission in writing from the commissioner of police) to: (1) carry a lighted torch; or (2) carry or bear any offensive weapons. Section 20(2) states that a violation of section 20 (1) is an offence for which the person is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding 50 cents or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months or both.

In July 2017, police in Sierra Leone banned group jogging in the street on the grounds that it encourages “disruptive behavior.” Group jogging had taken on a political tone in parts of Sierra Leone. For example, presidential candidates organized “fun runs” in Freetown and the northern town of Makeni, with participants wearing T-shirts bearing the name of the political party they support. The police’s “Public Notice” about the ban said “individuals desiring to jog for health reasons” were “at liberty to do so, but at recreational facilities or at the beach” and added that “any group of persons now found jogging in the streets without authorization will be dealt with according to law. You have been warned.” This seemed to underscore the ban’s intent to restrict freedom of assembly of oppositional political parties and activists. In March 2020, a civil society activist was also arrested and detained for a leading a demonstration of students to protest over the government’s refusal to pay the tuition fees of students of government scholarships.

Three years later, on April 3, 2023, less than three months before the country’s presidential, legislative and municipal elections to be held on June 24, the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC) issued a ban on all political street rallies after the PPRC stated it had convened all registered political parties, electoral management bodies, security sector actors and the press. PPRC spokesperson Lucien Momoh claim that the measure was taken to reduce election-related violence. The ban covered only traditional street gatherings and political parties could still convene in “designated areas” with “appropriate security coverage”.

Crackdowns on Protests

In March 2020, a civil society activist was arrested and detained for leading a student demonstration in protest over government’s refusal to pay the tuition fees of students. On July 3, 2022, opposition politicians Madam Femi Claudius Cole and Dr. Dennis Bright were arrested and detained for what the police referred to as “incitement”. On July 4, 2022, the police further arrested 57 people in Freetown, Lungi, Port Loko, Mile 91, and Magburaka for “organizing or participating in an unauthorized demonstration” in contravention of the Public Order Act 1965.

As these cases reveal, the mistrust between civil society and government is not improving. Following a two-day conference in Freetown, the civil society consortium, National Elections Watch (NEW), issued a communique on June 21, 2022 in which it asserted that, “there have been attempts since the 2018 elections to shrink the civic space using various approaches.” In response to the Communique, the Secretary-General of the ruling Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) issued a press statement on June 30, 2022, accusing NEW of being unfair and biased against the ruling SLPP. The statement further encouraged all NGO “friends to bring their own fair share of contribution to democracy building by being neutral and refrain from acting as rogues undermining state efforts.”

Additional Resources

GLOBAL INDEX RANKINGS
Ranking BodyRankRanking Scale
(best – worst possible)
UN Human Development Index185 (2023)1 – 193
World Justice Project Rule of Law Index110 (2024)1 – 142
Fund for Peace Fragile States Index45 (2024)179 – 1
Transparency International114 (2024)1 – 180
Freedom House: Freedom in the WorldStatus: Partly Free (2025)
Political Rights: 23
Civil Liberties: 36
Free/Partly Free/Not Free
40 – 0
60 – 0
REPORTS
UN Universal Periodic Review ReportsSierra Leone UPR page
Reports of UN Special RapporteursSierra Leone
U.S. State Department2024 Human Rights Report
Fund for Peace Fragile States Index ReportsSierra Leone
IMF Country ReportsSierra Leone and the IMF
Human Rights WatchSierra Leone page
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Online LibrarySierra Leone
NEWS

Sierra Leone bans political street rallies ahead of elections (May 2023)
Sierra Leone has banned political street rallies, which is a tradition that has for decades characterized electoral campaigns, less than three months before the presidential election, the government said. The Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC) said that election periods were “no time for dancing and merriment”, but rather “times for deep reflection”. The decision came as a surprise in a country where the two main political parties – the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), currently in power, and the All People’s Congress (APC) – hold parade-like rallies that move through town. Under the new rules, parties must now identify a single venue such as a stadium or community centre to hold their campaign events.

17 women protesters reportedly arrested in Freetown (July 2022)
It is reported that 17 women have been held in detention with lawyers being denied access to them. The women dressed in all black marched under the rainy streets of Freetown with microphones in their hands and were singing and calling on the government to hear to the suffering and hardship they are battling.

ARCHIVED NEWS

Members of Parliament summon 22 NGOs (June 2022)

Leadership and advocacy consultant condemns hate speech (September 2020)

CSOs frown at reviewed NGO policy (February 2020)

Parliament to discuss repeal of seditious libel laws (November 2019)

Access to justice is central to Sierra Leone’s development (October 2018)

Sierra Leone bans jogging in groups after police say they are ‘menacing’ (July 2017)

The arrest of the leader of the ADP is politically motivated – says opposition (June 2017)

NGOs, stakeholders discuss draft policy (May 2016)

Parliament Takes INGOs to Task (June 2014)

MCC Rejection – Getting It Right Next Time Round (December 2013)

Protestors killed at mine in Kono (December 2012)

Carter Center statement on Sierra Leone elections (October 2012)

Freedom of Information Bill willfully ignored (October 2012)

New legal aid law in Sierra Leone embraces the role of paralegals (May 2012)

Prosecutor Hollis applauds the people of Sierra Leone following Charles Taylor’s conviction (May 2012)

Continued delay in Parliament vote on Freedom of Information bill (April 2012)

Civil society in the country must be accountable (Part One) (July 2011)

Sierra Leone: HRC-SL, Unipsil hold consultations with CSOs (August 2010)

Sierra Leone woman barred from becoming chief (December 2009)