League of Arab States FlagNGO Law Monitor: League of Arab States

Introduction | Key Facts | Members | At a Glance
Key Legal Texts | Overview | News and Additional Resources

Download PDFDownload PDF Version
Last updated 6 June 2013

Introduction

Founded on March 19, 1945, the League of Arab States is the oldest existing international organization in the world, predating even the creation of the United Nations by seven months. Beginning with seven countries (Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Transjordan, and Yemen), the League has now grown to include twenty-two Arab nations (though Syria has been suspended since 2011).

The League of Arab States was created to "strengthen the close relations and numerous ties which bind the Arab States" and "direct their efforts toward the goal of the welfare of all Arab States... [and] the guarantee of their future and the realization of their aspirations," and today primarily serves to promote political, economic, cultural, and scientific cooperation among Arab states. The League also provides a forum for Arab states to debate and coordinate policy positions on matters of common concern; as but one example, an extraordinary meeting called in January 2013 by the Republic of Lebanon assessed the situation of refugees fleeing the ongoing crisis in Syria.

In March 2008 the Arab Charter on Human Rights entered into force. This landmark document was the result of more than forty-five years of efforts to draft a human rights treaty for the Arab world. Indeed, as far back as 1960 the Union of Arab Lawyers lobbied the League "to adopt an Arab Convention on Human Rights," and an earlier version of the Arab Charter drafted in 1994 was never ratified and failed to enter into force. On May 24, 2004, a revised Arab Charter on Human Rights was approved at the twenty-sixth Summit of the League of Arab States in Tunis, Tunisia. It is this second Arab Charter on Human Rights which took effect in 2008 upon the deposit of seventh ratification by an Arab state. As of this writing, the revised Arab Charter on Human Rights has been ratified by a total of seventeen states: Algeria (2006), Bahrain (2006), Egypt (signed 2004, not yet ratified), Iraq (2012), Jordan (2004), Kuwait (2006), Lebanon (2011), Libya (2006), Morocco (signed 2004, not yet ratified), Palestine (2007), Qatar (2009), Saudi Arabia (2009), Sudan (signed 2005, not yet ratified), Syria (2007), Tunisia (signed 2004, not yet ratified), the United Arab Emirates (2008), and Yemen (2008).

Although the Charter has been criticized by Arab civil society as falling short of international human rights standards in many key ways, it does establish an independent Arab Human Rights Committee charged with reviewing reports (submitted every three years) from ratifying states.

Back to Top

Key Facts

Headquarters Cairo, Egypt
Members 22 (Syria is currently suspended)
Established 1945
Founding Document Pact of the League of Arab States
Head Secretary General Nabil el-Araby
Governing Bodies Council of the League, Secretariat of the League, Arab Parliament
Key Human Rights Agreements Arab Charter on Human Rights [English] [عربي]
Key Judicial Bodies  none

Back to Top

Members

Algeria Lebanon Somalia
Bahrain Libya Sudan
Comoros Mauritania Syria*
Djibouti Morocco Tunisia
Egypt Oman United Arab Emirates
Iraq Palestine Yemen
Jordan Qatar  
Kuwait Saudi Arabia  

* Suspended member

Back to Top

At a Glance

Freedom of Association Legal Protection Article 28, Arab Charter on Human Rights
Judicial Bodies  none
Civil Society Participation   none
Human Rights Defenders Current Status

There is no specific protection for human rights defenders in the legal documents of the Arab League. For more information about the situation of human rights defenders in the Arab world, visit the UN's Arab Human Rights Index.

Back to Top

Key Legal Texts

Freedom of Association and Civil Society

Arab Charter on Human Rights [English] [عربي] 1990

As of this writing, the Charter has been endorsed by seventeen of the twenty-two Arab League members: Algeria (2006), Bahrain (2006), Egypt (signed 2004, not yet ratified), Iraq (2012), Jordan (2004), Kuwait (2006), Lebanon (2011), Libya (2006), Morocco (signed 2004, not yet ratified), Palestine (2007), Qatar (2009), Saudi Arabia (2009), Sudan (signed 2005, not yet ratified), Syria (2007), Tunisia (signed 2004, not yet ratified), the United Arab Emirates (2008), and Yemen (2008).

Back to Top

Overview

The Pact of the League of Arab States stipulates the purpose of the League of Arab States:

“The purpose of the League is to draw closer the relations between member States and coordinate their political activities with the aim of realizing a close collaboration between them, to safeguard their independence and sovereignty, and to consider in a general way the affairs and interests of the Arab countries.

It also has among its purposes a close co-operation of the member States with due regard to the structure of each of these States and the conditions prevailing therein, in the following matters:

  1. Economic and financial matters, including trade, customs, currency, agriculture and industry;
  2. Communications, including railways, roads, aviation, navigation, and posts and telegraphs;
  3. Cultural matters;
  4. Matters connected with nationality, passports, visas, execution of judgments and extradition;
  5. Social welfare matters;
  6. Health matters.”

(Article 2, Pact of the League of Arab States, March 22, 1945)

Although the call for Arab unity had been made for more than a century, the idea of having a single Arab organization bringing together all Arab countries did not evolve or unfold until World War II. During World War II, Arab countries experienced a growing resistance against colonial occupiers and the rapid growth of national movements that led to a number of Arab countries gaining their independence. In addition, Jewish immigration to Palestine and political unrest in Turkey and Iran encouraged greater Arab unity.

The League of Arab States was not established as a result of a regional power imposing its will on others; rather it was the result of careful negotiation that balanced the concerns of many different parties. The Pact of the Arab League and its principles are the result of a compromise between regional and national concerns. This compromise is reflected in the League’s rule of unanimity in voting and optional cooperation between Member States; its status as an inter-governmental Organization; and its limited authority. The Pact embodies the need for political consensus and public satisfaction.

The League faces many challenges because of the weakness or absence of democracy in most Arab States. There is considerable variation in the level of democracy, the nature of regimes, and the policies and positions of Arab governments. This disparity makes joint regional action nearly impossible despite common interests and goals Member States.

The Arab League and Freedom of Association

The Pact of the League of Arab States does not address freedom of association or partnership with civil society organizations. This is not surprising given that when the organization was established, these concepts were not common. In addition, the League is a regional organization mainly regulating relations between States. Only recently has the Arab League begun to address the concepts of civil society and freedom of association. In 2004, a Commissioner General for Civil Society was appointed.  His responsibility is to communicate with civil society organizations on behalf of the Arab League. Two departments were also established; the first is the Department of Human Rights that is concerned with developing an Arab human rights system, and the second is the Department of Civil Society Observation and Vocational Unions, established to communicate with NGOs in the Arab region in order to develop their role in the joint Arab action.

In May 2004, the Arab Charter on Human Rights was adopted. Article 24 states:

“Every citizen has the right: (…)

  1. To freely form and join associations with others.
  2. To freedom of association and peaceful assembly.
  3. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of these rights other than those which are prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

The Arab League and Civil Society Partnership

Although limited, the Arab League has organized activities in cooperation with CSOs. These activities have included regional conferences about protecting the freedom of association, the moral responsibility of CSOs in the Arab world, and the right to freedom of assembly. The Arab League also organized the First Arab Conference on Human Rights held in Doha, Qatar on December 15, 2008. 

However, these activities were mostly academic and did not address the practical environment for civil society in Arab League Member States. Consequently, no recommendations were made by the Arab League to Member States concerning protection of the freedom of association. 

Civil society is mostly excluded from participation in decision-making within the framework of the League of Arab States. This has prevented CSOs from playing a role in regional development. The Pact of the League of Arab States does not formally identify a role for civil society, and has very restrictive criteria for institutions that can participate in the work of the League as observers. In most cases, CSOs permitted to observe the League are associated with Member State governments in some way. 

One of the goals of the League of Arab States was to establish an integrated Arab system of human rights to protect fundamental rights and freedoms. The Arab Charter on Human Rights falls short of fulfilling this goal.

Challenges and Problems Related to Civil Society and Freedom of Association

The League of Arab States is an organization completely beholden to Member State governments. Thus, it is difficult for the organization to move forward on most issues, including those affecting civil society and freedom of association. This is reflected in its internal regulations for the Standing Committee on Human Rights:

  • Members of the committee shall be exclusively Member States in the Arab League.
  • The Committee shall review human rights-related issues based on what the Council of the League of Arab States or the General Secretariat transfers to the committee, and it shall provide recommendations regarding these issues. Recommendations shall have the support of two Member States.
  • NGOs and human rights organizations – accredited in the meetings of the Committee as observers according to the criteria and rules adopted – attend the meetings by invitation of the General Secretariat and the committee; however, if the Committee sees it necessary, it shall limit its meetings to Member States only.

These articles show the extent to which the Arab League is controlled by its Member States. The obvious result of this control has been a limited role for civil society within the Arab League where most of its Member States lack strong democratic histories.

In stark contrast, the Council of Arab Interior Ministers regularly meets and coordinates the actions of Arab States on issues of security with limited obstacles. This demonstrates that the Arab League can be a vehicle for collective action on issues considered important by its members. Hopefully, development, economic, and cultural issues will gain more support.

Back to Top

News and Additional Resources

While we aim to maintain information that is as current as possible, we realize that situations can rapidly change.  If you are aware of any additional information or inaccuracies on this page, please keep us informed; write to ICNL at ngomonitor@icnl.org.

Lebanon to protest to Arab League after spillover Syrian fire kills two (May 2013)
Lebanon condemned the spillover of fire from Syrian rebel and regime forces onto its territory and said it would protest to the Arab League after artillery fire killed two people. Social Affairs Minister Abu Faour said the measures would include "the preparation of a memorandum to the Arab League", which would "protest ... any attack regardless of which party was responsible for it."

Need for human rights watch groups in the wake of ethnic conflict (November 2012)
The war in Syria is no longer a civil war but a full-fledged ethnic conflict. Several thousands have lost lives, while thousands of others have been rendered homeless, with many fleeing across the Syrian border every day. As the war continues to wage on, there is a growing need for a more involved participation of human rights watch groups in the country.

Arab League, OIC proposals out of step with progress on freedom of expression (September 2012)
Human Rights First said that Arab League and the Organization for Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) calls for the international criminalization of blasphemy mark a step backwards in progress toward tolerance. Such measures were also woven into remarks delivered Wednesday by Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, who made his debut before the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly. Human Rights First helped to defeat such measure at the United Nations last year and now says that efforts to reignite this debate are out of step with the basic human right of freedom of expression and U.S. foreign policy. They are also out of step with the positions that OIC States accepted to adopt last year at the United Nations.

Friends of Syria-3 seeks support of League of Arab States and civil society to resolve crisis (July 2012)
The participants of the Friends of Syria-3 formally called upon the Syrian regime to meet its commitments with a view to the full implementation of the six-point plan for crisis resolution drawn up by Kofi Annan, Joint Special Envoy of the United Nations, and the League of Arab States on the Syrian Crisis. They called on all Syrians and civil society organizations to publicly dissociate themselves from the human rights violations committed by the Syrian regime.

Two scholars argue for "League of Arab Societies" in article for Foreign Policy (March 2012)
Ahmed Charai, publisher of the weekly Moroccan newspaper L'Observateur, and author Joseph Braude argue that the region needs a transnational body that speaks for the aspirations of civil society activists and reformists -- and the tens of millions of people who stand to benefit from efforts to fight corruption, stem extremism, provide electoral transparency, and build institutions to serve women and the working class. They would call it a "League of Arab Societies." Ironically, they say the organization should draw inspiration from the region's most successful transnational institution in recent memory: The Muslim World League (MWL), an umbrella organization headquartered in Saudi Arabia that drew together the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafi clerics, and jihadists to fight secular dictatorships.

News Archive

Ever fewer friends (November 2011)

Arab League (November 2011)

League of Arab States will support Azerbaijan's UNSC bid (September 2011) 

HRW Calls Arab League to Hold Emergency Meeting on Syria (August 2011)

Arab League Debates Options in Libya (April 2011)

Arab League states: a recent history of protests (March 2011) 

Arab League asks U.N. for no-fly zone over Libya (March 2011) 

Conference of Arab Expatriates (December 2010)

The League of Arab States condemned Israeli military raid on flotilla (June 2010)

A Resolution on Iraq Issued by the Arab League (February 2010)

5th Meeting of the Arab Committee for Human Rights (February 2010)

Back to Top

The foregoing information was collected by the Arab Forum for Alternatives in Cairo, Egypt.